Ah, that's interesting. I'm guessing that's (hopefully) an easier fix for them than if it was a problem with their developing machine.It isn't the development.
It is the scanning software they are using and its "profile" for Portra film.
It isn't so much a "fix" as it is an adjustment.Ah, that's interesting. I'm guessing that's (hopefully) an easier fix for them than if it was a problem with their developing machine.
As far as I can remember, I've only ever used Portra all the time I've been using that shop.It isn't so much a "fix" as it is an adjustment.
Strictly speaking, it is impossible to set up an automatic printer to always get the colour right on photographs of scenes that vary. All the automatic systems out there try to evaluate the subject and then estimate what the correct adjustments are for good exposure and colour. And just like automatic metering, the "correct" setting isn't always what the automatic system suggests.
There is one other variable though. I am assuming that you have got good results from this lab using other films. That tells me that their printing systems (which includes scanning systems in almost cases now) are calibrated correctly for those films - i.e. they are using the right profile for those films. Different films require different profiles.
I had a reoccurring problem with Dywannes years ago, they kept printing red rock on the ground in Utah and Arizona as green. I would complain and have them reprint them. .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?