Colour film iso 200 ( pushed to iso 1600) developed in BW chemicals - my examples

Scales / jommuhtree

D
Scales / jommuhtree

  • 0
  • 0
  • 17
3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 6
  • 7
  • 155
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 115

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,063
Messages
2,785,637
Members
99,792
Latest member
sepd123
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13
Location
manchester ,
Format
Sub 35mm
hi.

I got few rolls of cheap Kodak color film for 1£ in one of Pound Land . As I never did that before, I developed it in BW chemistry , after I pushed the film from ISO 200 to ISO 1600. I used Kodak (Colourplus and Gold ) ISO 200 , Kodak D76 and Superfix Plus (Tetenal) rapid fixer. I developed the film as HP5+. I used 5mpix film scanner and ADOBE Lightroom for postprocessing. I'm aware that results are not perfect as a whole process is not :smile:. It was a nice and very educating experiment for me and I would recommend any greenhorn like me to try it... Some sample photos below..

cheers,

p.
 

Attachments

  • BW FILM Q-2.jpg
    BW FILM Q-2.jpg
    429.6 KB · Views: 814
  • PICT0069.jpg
    PICT0069.jpg
    492.3 KB · Views: 850
  • BW FILM J.jpg
    BW FILM J.jpg
    457.8 KB · Views: 825
  • BW FILM K X.jpg
    BW FILM K X.jpg
    503.6 KB · Views: 773
Last edited by a moderator:

Samuelg

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
39
Format
Medium Format
Bloody hell, for a push that far on poundland film i am impressed with the tonal range. I have some D-76 mixed up as well might have to give this a go, excellent photos :smile:

Out of interest what scanner do you use ? I'm in the market for one, taking photos of my negs with a homemade macro lens just isn't cutting it anymore
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13
Location
manchester ,
Format
Sub 35mm
OK, let me put it right - Negative after developing was VERY dark so after scanning some of scans I had to really strongly process in LR - brightness, contrast , whole shebang :smile: - I would do that in real darkroom as well I suppose :smile: . I scanned with inexpensive ION film2SD negative scanner and I was really surprised how simple and satisfying whole process was for such a beginner like me :smile: . Resolution is not great but I suppose I can get a nice A4 size prints of it , which is fair enough for me ...
I think if I will stick to pushing from ISO 200 to ISO 400 next time ( as the rule of the thumb is to develop it as a HP5+ ) , grain and tonal range should be better, what do you think ?

p.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,548
Format
35mm RF
But why would you wish to do this? Is there not a better way of recording images at low level illumination?
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13
Location
manchester ,
Format
Sub 35mm
Are you suggesting tripod and long exposure time ? Not for me I'm affraid... I suffer for advanced tripodophobia and I like to do photos on the street , off hand with high speed ISO . Beside it has to be developed as ISO 400 so I have to push it anyway...

edit. my mistake - I don't have to push it to ISO 400 ( but I can- to get more speed ) but I just have to develop it as such :smile:.

p.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom