I have a roll of color print film that I burned testing a camera, but I want to develop it. I was considering using it as a cross-processing experiment. To the best of my knowledge, developing C41 film in B&W chemicals results in a black-and-white negative, but I don't know what time to use, so I figured I could just use Diafine. Will this result in a printable neg?
If you process C41 color neg film in Diafine you'll get a barely printable image. If you scan them, you may get decent results. The orange base of the film will royally screw up anything you thought you knew about printing. How do I know? I've tried it. Especially the highlights are tough to do anything with.
Lith printing might work better. But scanning really is the way to go in my experience.
You can process C41 film in a B&W dev, and fix, wash well and re-halogenate in a Ferricyanide/Bromide bleach, wash then re-develop in C41 chemistry as per normal.
Depending on the B&W dev you use you can get some quite interesting results.
You can process C41 film in a B&W dev, and fix, wash well and re-halogenate in a Ferricyanide/Bromide bleach, wash then re-develop in C41 chemistry as per normal.
Here are a few shots of Kodak Gold developed in Diafine
Can't comment on the "print-ability" of these, but they scan pretty well.
This is just SilverFast with the regular Kodak Gold preset, and some dodge & burn later basically..
Well normally you would but there are or rather were some applied techniques such as for astronomy where a B&W developer might be used first to modify contrast although looping was the most common procedure, develop (C41) fix, wash, rehalogenating bleach, wash re-expose, then re=develop in C41, this can be done a few times to increase colour saturation and density. There were also special colour developers, here in the UK/Europe they were available from Michael Maunders, he used to have a website but retired abroad and stopped trading
These techniques and formulae were published and discussed in Scientific Journals, occasionally in the Astro-Photographotography section in the British Journal of Photography but I've never seen mention of them in any general photo magazines or books.