Color Negative to B+W print

Flow of thoughts

D
Flow of thoughts

  • 3
  • 1
  • 52
Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 5
  • 3
  • 75
Plague

D
Plague

  • 0
  • 0
  • 52
Vinsey

A
Vinsey

  • 4
  • 1
  • 90

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,165
Messages
2,787,321
Members
99,830
Latest member
Photoemulator
Recent bookmarks
1

Kirks518

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
1,494
Location
Flori-DUH
Format
Multi Format
Is there special paper needed to print a color negative in black and white? My local lab said they were out of the paper needed, but I was under the impression you just need B+W paper, even if the neg is a color neg. They only print B+W optically, so I figured they would have paper to do this. Just wondering.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
not any more for normal enlarging paper.

the Ilford publication on printing gives info on printing
colour negatives to normal vc paper. can't remember what it is called th at moment.

it's perfectly doable .
 

railwayman3

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,816
Format
35mm
The lab may have been thinking of Kodak Panalure paper, which was discontinued quite some years ago. This was a panchromatic paper designed to produce a greytone image from colour negs with those tones matching what would be produced by a normal B&W panchromatic film. I guess it was the "Rolls-Royce" solution for theoretically perfect results, but, as pdeeh says, it's entirely possible to get good results with a bit of experimentation on normal B&W papers.

The old technical data sheet is still available on

www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/g27/g27.pdf
 

RPC

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
1,630
Format
Multi Format
Ordinary b&w paper does not respond properly to color to produce accurate tones from a color negative. You need panchromatic paper, and I don't know if anybody makes it anymore. I know Kodak use to. So I am not sure if there is any way to accurately do it anymore, but you may be able to get close under the right conditions.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,013
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I would have thought the local lab would need a separate processor set up for B&W chemicals. Given what I would have thought is a limited demand for genuine B&W prints this would be expensive for the lab.

However I know labs can produce quite good prints from genuine B&W negs on RA4 paper so I'd assume that they could do the same for RA4 B&W prints from a colour neg

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
406
Location
Forks, Wa
Format
Medium Format
I have sent my scans off to mpix.com and they have a real black and white paper. It has a pebble texture so I have them coat it and it comes out really nice.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,223
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The Ilford black and white roll papers designed for use in high volume, digital/laser exposure printers are light sensitive and are panchromatic, but they are optimized for very short exposures.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
kirks518

the thing is, a color negative onto black and white paper would yield something sort of like what black and white
photography looked like before the 19teens 1920s when panchromatic films became available. it would be like a black and white print
from a paper negative. often times people say orthochromatic, blue blind .. whatever it is the rendition on regular black and white paper
will not look like a "normal" black and white print. reds will look black skin sometimes blotchy, skies sort of without definition ( blank )
.. in other words regular color film CAN be printed on modern black and whtie papers but it won't look ( tonally ) what you might expect your color negative to look like.

have fun !
john
 
OP
OP
Kirks518

Kirks518

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
1,494
Location
Flori-DUH
Format
Multi Format
Thanks all. As I don't do any wet darkroom stuff, I had no clue.

The image was pretty close to monochromatic, it's my avatar, the SpaceX launch.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
That image should work fairly well. I've gotten good results when printing from color negative on b/w paper by just adding a lot of magenta filtration, because one of the things that happens with the orange mask in the color negative film is that it absolutely kills contrast. So print on VC paper, with your contrast set up around grade 4 or 5. You'd have to do some experimenting to see if/how you like the look, and how to tweak it to get what you want, but it is possible.
 

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
Look around for Panalure, it's still out there on ebay, it is definitely the best solution for this if you can find some.
 

darkroommike

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
1,728
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Once upon a time Kodak made a panchromatic paper called Panalure, the last version Panalure II RC even came in three grades. I used boxes of it to print wallet sized black and whites from high school senior portrait sessions (at that time yearbooks were still conventionally composed and shot using graphic art materials and the color wallets looked wretched when shot on blue sensitive materials). I think that other companies also made similar materials, Konica(?), panchromatic sensitivity, processed in Dektol or the equivalent. Any Panalure you buy on Ebay will be 25 years old or older.

Before the high contrast Panalure RC II H came out, if I got a VPS-III negative that was low in contrast (usually a high key soft focus shot) I would print it on Ilford Multigrade III RC or Kodak Polycontrast III RC with a 3 1/2 filter. These materials are sensitive to both green and blue light so were in essence a pseudo orthochromatic emulsion.

Later one hour labs used to have a monochromatic RA-4 material for printing Ilford XP2 and Kodak 400CN black and white C41 negatives.

Today, other than a d-word solution, you only choice would be a variable contrast paper like Multigrade IV RC.
 
Last edited:

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
As far as I am concerned color negatives do not produce satisfactory prints. You really do need a panchromatic paper.
 

rpavich

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
1,520
Location
West virginia, USA
Format
35mm
As far as I am concerned color negatives do not produce satisfactory prints. You really do need a panchromatic paper.
I've tried this several times and I have to agree. It's possible but the results aren't pleasing to me. IF you HAVE to have a B&W print and this is the ONLY option...ok, but otherwise, I'd do it using the "D-word" mentioned already.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Dirigible?
Demodulation?
Dumbledore?

or do we just mean digital?
(there's really no need to be coy)
 

canvassy

Member
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
263
Location
St Paul, MN
Format
Multi Format
I actually have some Kodak Panalure II RC paper that I got with my enlarger. Haven't had a chance to try it out yet but this thread has piqued my interest.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,769
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Any decent "real camera store" that prints ra-4 should be able to make a very good rc c-print . I still have some frozen fiber base Panalure Portrait dbl. Wt. .I used it for black and white negatives because it toned like no other paper I've ever seen.
Scan your negative and convert it to back and white and use a dreaded ink printer.
Best Regards Mike
 

chaspics

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
1
Format
Multi Format
Tripped over this post accidentally. If you want a non-digital BW print from a color negative, you can experiment with these ideas. I've been there.
Try projecting onto a sheet of regular panchromatic 25-100 ISO film, and process using any of the Direct Positive Reversal chemicals available. Takes some trial and error. Film will be at least 10x faster than enlarging paper.
More of a pain, but doable, is to use the same procedure as before and process as a negative, then contact /project on to another sheet and process again. Direct Duplicating films used to be available for this purpose, but they're long gone to my knowledge. Furthermore, the masking in color film base is very close to a safelight in color, enough so that using on regular paper can make for some very long exposures.
Good Luck!
Chas
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,061
Format
8x10 Format
Pain in the butt to do without either a pan paper or via scan. A few weeks ago I made an 8x10 projection interpositive on TMax 100 film from a 6x9 Ektar negative via a deep blue 47 filter. This was used to generate a contact interneg on Arista Ortho Litho film dev in HC-110 1:15 from stock (not conc). Then I printed it on MGWT. The result was way way better than what I would have gotten on something like ole Panalure, but it was a lot of work to do, given the experimentation leading up to it.
 

adelorenzo

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,421
Location
Whitehorse, Yukon
Format
4x5 Format
I've posted about this before, but IME I have found it very easy to print from C-41 negatives on B&W multigrade paper. I keep hearing all this stuff about extremely long exposures or impossible contrast but I wonder how many people posting that have actually tried it.

You can see an example here: Printing color negatives on blackand white paper. My post below quotes the Ilford darkroom manual and is worth reading.
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom