Color filter question?

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
A red filter passed red and blocks light of other wavelengths, otherwise it you wouldn't see it as a 'red' filter, only your compensating exposure amplifies 'red'. Strictly speaking, a filter 'filters' everything to a certain degree but least of its own color. That's why it works!
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
They block light of all colors except their own. That is why you need to increase exposure when using them. By blocking some colors, they emphasize their own color.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Filters are totally passive. They do nothing but sit there and get in light's way, so they must block it; they cannot amplify it. What they do is change color relationships by selectively blocking certain colors more than others. They color they block the least is the color that they are, but they are always blocking light, not increasing it. However, if an exposure compensation is made for the fact that the filter is blocking light, you end up with a correct exposure, but with altered color relationships. The filter factors you often hear used tell you how many times the unfiltered amount of light you must add to get the right exposure.
 

CBG

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
889
Format
Multi Format
If filters amplified light, say if a red filter amplified the red light, then filter factors would be to reduce exposure.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Ralph is correct. The rule of thumb that I use for color filters used in BW photography is that if the filter is a warm one ie yellow, or red it will allow like colors through (lighten) the color, but darken cool colors like blues and greens and visa versa. These are just rough rules of thumb.
 

jglass

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
399
Location
Austin
Format
Multi Format
I believe, in addition to what others have said, color filters block the most light that is the complimentary color. So that a red filter blocks more blue light than any other and thus darkens (underexposes) blue areas such as the sky. Correct?
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
I chose the wrong word when I originally asked about "amplifying" light. I know better...I should have said block or pass the color wavelengths.

They're really no "amplifying", but it just changes the intensity ratio between of the different colors of light. A red filter will have some effect on red colors while blocking most blue or cyan colors. That's why red filters are used to darken sky. The clouds are accentuated because they're usually neutral in color gray or white so there's little effect on the clouds. Since the relationship of the intensity has changed, it looks like the clouds are lightened.
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
A little bit about color separation filters, for fun:

The eye has 3 "color sensation nerves", red, green and blue. When all are present in equal proportion we see white. Combinations of the 3 produce all the colours we can see.

So the basis of colour reproduction in photography is to separate these three sensation colors thru the use of filters. A deep red filter (25, 29..) passes more or less only red to the negative and thus you have your red separation. A deep blue filter (47B) passes only blue to produce the blue separation negative, and the green (58) filter passes only green to produce the green sep. The modern films we use do this at once, in an integral pack, though instead of using 3 filters, the sensitivities of the 3 layers are made so that each one only records their respective color (though there is a yellow filter after the front element, but that's another story altogether...)

Each negative is then a record of only that particular color sensation. If one where to turn these negatives into positives and project them thru their respective filters onto a screen where all three overlapped, you would get a full color image synthesized by the additive method. This principle is how screen-plates work (autochromes, dufaycolor...) and your TV. No modern photo system uses this, unless you consider digital display (which I don't! ).

Subtractive color is slightly harder to wrap your head around, but the idea is to subtract color from white light, as opposed to adding colored light to darkness. All modern films, E6 & C41 and all modern papers, Ilfochrome & RA4, use subtracive synthesis. Assuming we have separation positives, then we must turn the shadow regions into the complementary color of whatever filter that separation was shot thru. So your red filter positive needs to have cyan shadows since cyan is the opposite of red and since the shadows are dark, that means they have no or little red in them. The blue separation needs to have yellow shadows to subtract blue where we don't want it, and the green separation needs to have magenta shadows. Combined, the 3 colors will block all light and produce black, where different amounts of the 3 overlap we get all of the natural colors. Cyan & magenta will subtract red & green from white light to produce blue; cyan & yellow will subtract red & blue from white light to produce green, yellow & magenta will overlap to subtract blue & green light to produce red. The complementary colors to the additive primaries are, logically enough, referred to as the subtractive primaries.

And that's where babies come from!

 

Vonder

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
1,237
Location
Foo
Format
35mm
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…