color film choice

The Gap

H
The Gap

  • 5
  • 2
  • 53
Ithaki Steps

H
Ithaki Steps

  • 2
  • 0
  • 73
Pitt River Bridge

D
Pitt River Bridge

  • 6
  • 0
  • 81

Forum statistics

Threads
199,004
Messages
2,784,476
Members
99,765
Latest member
NicB
Recent bookmarks
3

rmolson

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
327
Location
Mansfield Oh
Format
Medium Format
Fuji Color 160 or Kodak Portra 160

Which of the two types of color negative film in 120 format would be most suitable for food photography? The resulting prints will be used for a Chefs portfolio.
 

Aurum

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
917
Location
Landrover Ce
Format
Medium Format
Dead Link Removed

Whilst not a purchaser of the products there, they do have a nice feature in the layout that most of the films they sell are marketed with example photo's that give an indication of the results you might expect. If nothing else it allows side by side comparison of the merits of Portra VC vs NC

NC IMHO is a little different from traditional consumer films in that it doesn't "Pop" colour with high intensity. It may be considered very accurate, but prehaps a little flatter than you might be used to. VC is more well "Vivid"

If you want high saturation prints Ektar is something to consider.

Fuji also make good colour films but side by side with Kodak, the pallette is a little different.

For photographing food, I suppose it depends if there a lot of vivid colours (Tomatoes, peppers etc) which may look a little dayglo with VC. Conversely stuff like pastry may benefit from a VC variant to make it look a little richer.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom