Color 120 process at Wally Mart, YUK

St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 5
  • 2
  • 40
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 3
  • 4
  • 71
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 3
  • 2
  • 120
Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 13
  • 8
  • 310

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,867
Messages
2,782,205
Members
99,734
Latest member
Elia
Recent bookmarks
0

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
So, I've seen some threads about having 120 B/W developed at Wal-mart so I gave it a try but with some Fuji 160 "S" given to me by the nice gent I got some MF Lenses from.
YUK
The pic's came back sharp but very, very dull. No black nor color sat...
Could this be the "S" film or is this Wally mart?

I did not push/pull and my instructions were little but clear, i.e., return film spool which they did, 4x6 etc.... I've not scanned them yet.

I use the same lens with the digi back with no problems.

P.S. I'm in NJ and use to use A&I mailers for my process but they became pretty expensive and long times, b/w I do on my own and it's more fun.
Any suggestions for a lab please?

Thank you.
Tom
 

nickandre

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,918
Location
Seattle WA
Format
Medium Format
This sounds like a "machine sitting idle for two weeks while developer expired within" story. Why would you have walmart themselves process anything? I give them my kodachrome but the only chance they have to botch that is when they hand the envelope to fuji to do it for them. In the end, slides w/ walmart=ok; in house C41= bad news bears.

Suggestions would be any lab that gets enough film to keep their process stable. Try Dwayne's photo.

Nobody will beat DIY home processing for costs.
 
OP
OP
dwdmguy

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
tib, walmart does in fact send their 120 and 135 to Fuji Labs which is why I thought I'd be safe.. Guess I was wrong... I'm looking forward to seeing the scan which I'll post later.
tx
 

PHOTOTONE

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,412
Location
Van Buren, A
Format
Large Format
Excuse me for possibly stating the obvious, but are you judging the quality of negative processing by the quality of the cheap prints you got back with the film? Not a way to judge film quality. You need to look at and evaluate the negatives. Now I know that color negative film can be hard to evaluate, but compare them to other negatives on the same film stock that you know are good. Do they look radically different? Do they look very "thin?".
 
OP
OP
dwdmguy

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
Well, that was the case. Just bad prints. At $1.80 for 16 exposures I can live with it.
Thanks tons guys.
Tom
 
OP
OP
dwdmguy

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
Sammy In the Snow.....

Now, the print of this bad boy was just nasty, but the scan shows me that it's ok. Taken with a 120 film, Fuji 160S and I checked, it's still available.....
 

Attachments

  • Sammy Film for Post.jpg
    Sammy Film for Post.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 97
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom