Collotype ,better than offset but others ?

Table for four.

H
Table for four.

  • 4
  • 0
  • 25
Waiting

A
Waiting

  • 1
  • 0
  • 39
Westpier

A
Westpier

  • 1
  • 2
  • 41
Westpier

A
Westpier

  • 2
  • 0
  • 30
Morning Coffee

A
Morning Coffee

  • 6
  • 0
  • 71

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,580
Messages
2,761,450
Members
99,408
Latest member
Booger Flicker
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,825
Location
İstanbul
Format
35mm
Youtube collotype videos are showing that process is not hard.

And I found collotype postal stamps were long time trade secret and now they are more expensive for collectors.

I want to ask , is that process still good as carbon , platin , wetplate , woodburytype or is it a old time interesting invention ?

Umut
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,153
Format
4x5 Format
Collotypes are easier to produce than Woodburytypes. I don't know if this book by Todd Walker contains collotypes or prints of collotypes. I believe he may have printed the book himself though...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Todd-Walker...sons-Photographics-1st-Ed-Photo-/391325293291

Woodburytypes are harder to come by, and the ones that are available, are typically portraits of actors (so I am not as interested in them).
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
Youtube collotype videos are showing that process is not hard.

And I found collotype postal stamps were long time trade secret and now they are more expensive for collectors.

I want to ask , is that process still good as carbon , platin , wetplate , woodburytype or is it a old time interesting invention ?

Umut
Collotypes were commercially available until fairly recently. The Benrido studio in Japan is still making collotypes: http://benrido-collotype.today/
It is possible to make collotypes at home (not so, Woodbury's). Collotype is a photomechanical process, but true continuous tone and capable of very high quality. It is plenty difficult, especially in color. You can simplify the process by printing monochrome and using sheet film instead of coating your own glass plates. For best results you need an etching press to print the plates.
 

gzinsel

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
402
Format
Med. Format RF
printed work IN INK, regardless of process, IS NOT AS FINE, as prints make with SILVER. However for reproductions Collotype is a great way to render continuous tone images.
 

NedL

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
3,370
Location
Sonoma County, California
Format
Multi Format
Interesting that you mention this today. Just yesterday I was wondering if it might be possible to create a collotype using AFC ( ammonium ferric citrate ) instead of dichromate. I think a press would be fun and addictive...
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
printed work IN INK, regardless of process, IS NOT AS FINE, as prints make with SILVER. However for reproductions Collotype is a great way to render continuous tone images.
CAPS don't make this true :smile: What is your definition of "fine"? Carbon transfers can match the resolution, acutance, and tonal scale of silver, along an infinite variety of surface treatments, image tones, and relief, too.
 

gzinsel

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
402
Format
Med. Format RF
last time I checked, Carbon prints are NOT inked, that would be collotypes. maybe I should have stated in addition to Silver process, those treated by potassium dichromate, either way INK CAN NOT, due to its PHYSICALITY can not render tone as FINELY,, it fills in. Collotype, while is continuous tone, can not match. if you read original post :::is that process still good as carbon , platin , wetplate , woodburytype or is it a old time interesting invention ? so. . .. . I answered . . . ." not as fine" as carbon, platen, wet plate. woodburtype. All of these he is suggesting or comparing to are not Printed with ink!!!!!! they are continuous tone prints made from silver or a dichromate process, which uses the straight line of the curve.
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
last time I checked, Carbon prints are NOT inked, that would be collotypes. maybe I should have stated in addition to Silver process, those treated by potassium dichromate, either way INK CAN NOT, due to its PHYSICALITY can not render tone as FINELY,, it fills in. Collotype, while is continuous tone, can not match. if you read original post :::is that process still good as carbon , platin , wetplate , woodburytype or is it a old time interesting invention ? so. . .. . I answered . . . ." not as fine" as carbon, platen, wet plate. woodburtype. All of these he is suggesting or comparing to are not Printed with ink!!!!!! they are continuous tone prints made from silver or a dichromate process, which uses the straight line of the curve.
Sorry, your communication is not very precise. I have been making carbon transfers with ink for 15 years and they can can render all the detail and tonality of a silver print. I think you are actually referring to planographic or intaglio processes. These can also render a full range of tones and plenty of detail, but if you prefer silver, that's fine. My point is that collotypes can achieve very high quality and until recently were produced by high-end print studios.
 

jtk

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
4,943
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Format
35mm
Sorry, your communication is not very precise. I have been making carbon transfers with ink for 15 years and they can can render all the detail and tonality of a silver print. I think you are actually referring to planographic or intaglio processes. These can also render a full range of tones and plenty of detail, but if you prefer silver, that's fine. My point is that collotypes can achieve very high quality and until recently were produced by high-end print studios.

I'm currently sorting my collection of collotypes that were printed on very light weight paper, glued onto very light board... beautiful scenic stuff from 19th century. Will do something similar with Japanese Washi paper with gilded edges for some of my own scenics that I've ignored due to my preference for much bigger prints.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,505
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Ink is OK, it worked well for Rembrandt, Durer, etc. But ink works better for etchings, they nearly always show a tone from hand wiping the plate. A photo can give bright whites, or you can use toners. Offset printing is for making books and such, you won't get a great image that way.

I don't know why anyone would use the collotype process today vs a fine art process or a photograph, but maybe pschwart knows how to go about getting what he likes. It would seem difficult/impossible to get sharp images up close due the the way they're made, although from viewing distance they look just fine. A mezzotint can kick it's butt in sharpness and tone, but that's a fine art process that is a very, very hard thing to make.

You may be able to make an analog photo mezzotint, that might be "better" than a collotype?, but I don't know how it's done. People often make fake mezzotints in PS, but it's sort of a BS process.
 
Last edited:

jtk

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
4,943
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Format
35mm
Momus, analog mezzotint is not just an effect/look/style: it's a halftone that uses scratches rather than dots.

The mezzotint halftone screen is/was used same way as conventional halftone screen, in contact with Kodalith film (100% black, no tone). It can be more attractive than straight continuous tone or conventional half-tone. The highlights can pop selectively, according to skill set.

I had posters printed as marketing pieces by a small, more-than-usually skilled San Francisco litho shop..gave those to major agency art directors (e.g. Young & Rubicam) and got immediate assignments for B&W photography. Knowing about that gave me a big competitive edge.

Collotypes can also be beautiful, were relied upon for small print by many pros in Stieglitz era. I have a collection of those that were shot in Central Europe before Soviet/Nazi atrocities.
 

jtk

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
4,943
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Format
35mm
Momus, analog mezzotint is not just an effect/look/style: it's a halftone that uses scratches rather than dots.

The mezzotint halftone screen is/was used same way as conventional halftone screen, in contact with Kodalith film (100% black, no tone). It can be more attractive than straight continuous tone or conventional half-tone. The highlights can pop selectively, according to skill set.

I had posters printed as marketing pieces by a small, more-than-usually skilled San Francisco litho shop..gave those to major agency art directors (e.g. Young & Rubicam) and got immediate assignments for B&W photography. Knowing about that gave me a big competitive edge.

Collotypes can also be beautiful, were relied upon for small print by many pros in Stieglitz era. I have a collection of those that were shot in Central Europe before Soviet/Nazi atrocities.

Should add that my small collection of collotype prints is mostly mounted on gilt-edged cabinet cards.
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom