Cinestill 800T is not exactly cheap, so it's not a good candidate for "oh, let's just give it a try" type experiments. Funny thing is: ECN-2 is a process based on CD-3 color developer - just like E-6, so whatever results you get, they are going to be more stable than C-41 processed samples.Thanks for the info. I've done C-41 in E-6 chemistry. It is an interesting experiment with cheap film, but the results aren't anything to expend much time or money on.
Is it best to pull this film if you only have c41 chemistry. I just received a couple of rolls I ordered and will probably use it for mostly cityscape twilight type shots, maybe.
Thank you.I've seen the opposite shooting Vision3 500T. It behaves well around 650 and it seems that C-41 give a push. 800 is no sweat with it.
Cinestill is the only emulsion I am aware of which gives you ISO 500 in tungsten light. With my 70-200 IS lens I can barely hand hold shots in room light with this film at F/2.8, unlike with any other color film.Why bother with this stuff? It's no bargain at any price.There are several color films that can be processed locally. This is an excellent example of the adage that "A fool and his money are soon parted."
Cinestill is the only emulsion I am aware of which gives you ISO 500 in tungsten light. With my 70-200 IS lens I can barely hand hold shots in room light with this film at F/2.8, unlike with any other color film.
Why bother with this stuff? It's no bargain at any price.There are several color films that can be processed locally. This is an excellent example of the adage that "A fool and his money are soon parted."
Why bother with this stuff? It's no bargain at any price.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?