Well, they have to source the film stock, process it to remove the remjet, spool and repackage the film, and arrange for distribution. They have to pay their own r&d cost, and presumably do this with very little economy of scale. The fact that they can price it anywhere close to Kodak's product is actually kind of remarkable.
You misunderstood, we are saying the same thing and I perfectly understand why Cinestill charges what they charge.
What I do not understand is when people complain that it is expensive to buy. Expensive compared to what, as you say you're paying only 5% more for a niche product compared to a mainstream one. As far as I am concerned it is no more expensive or cheaper than any other film.
Well I don't know what "cinematic colors" are. Like Ektar only less saturated - well that would be "like Portra, only more in need of filtration for open shade" maybe. But ok, the palette is different. That's reason enough if it's different enough to matter and be noticed.
You misunderstood, we are saying the same thing and I perfectly understand why Cinestill charges what they charge.
What I do not understand is when people complain that it is expensive to buy. Expensive compared to what, as you say you're paying only 5% more for a niche product compared to a mainstream one. As far as I am concerned it is no more expensive or cheaper than any other film.
A recan is a can that has been unsealed and re sealed it might have been wound etc. but will all be there.
A short end is what is left in the unexposed side of the Michael mouse ears cassette when they load another cassette to avoid running out part way through next sequence.
Some fraction of 400 or 1000 foot.
Normally the low budget teams will be hanging around like vultures snapping up residual things but sometimes they are available to insiders.