Cinema 35mm

Buckwheat, Holy Jim Canyon

A
Buckwheat, Holy Jim Canyon

  • 2
  • 2
  • 729
Sonatas XII-44 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-44 (Life)

  • 2
  • 2
  • 868
Have A Seat

A
Have A Seat

  • 0
  • 0
  • 1K
Cotswold landscape

H
Cotswold landscape

  • 4
  • 1
  • 1K
Carpenter Gothic Spires

H
Carpenter Gothic Spires

  • 3
  • 0
  • 3K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,634
Messages
2,794,522
Members
99,974
Latest member
Walkingjay
Recent bookmarks
0

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,226
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Why does a movie camera have to shoot negative film.?
Is there nothing similar to color slide film that woks for cinema cameras.?
Thank You
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Actually, many people use reversal film for motion pictures. If you shoot w/ negative film and project it onto a screen, all you are going to get is a negative image. At some point, negative film has to be transferred to positive film for projecting, so if you shoot w/ reversal film to begin with, there you are.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
The movie studios use negative film because they need several positive copies of each scene for editing etc. Obviously the amateur does not need this.
 

tedr1

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
940
Location
50 miles from NYC USA
Format
Multi Format
......................and it is easier (better?) to make duplicates from negatives than positives (although I believe the motion picture industry had methods to convert every format to every other format)

also I think exposure latitude probably enters the equation, color negative materials have more than color positive materials so the negative film is more tolerant of camera exposure variations, and exposure inconsistencies can be corrected when the positive is made.
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,226
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
The movie studios use negative film because they need several positive copies of each scene for editing etc. Obviously the amateur does not need this.
Yes, of course.....there is my answer.
I forget that Hollywood would be producing for distribution to theaters.:redface::whistling:
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,262
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
If you are making a movie in 35mm, it is unlikely to be the family waving at the camera (a home movie). Reversal stocks were never good to make duplicates from: color, contrast and film speed all suffer greatly. If you're making a movie one must work from duplicates, and negatives are better for that. And you would NEVER project camera original images, too much risk of damage.

That said, reversal direct projection stocks can really be magical when projected as intended. So amateur 8 and 16mm film sizes enjoyed popularity back in the day.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,904
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
Hollywood movies are shot in many takes. And one can be today and then the next much later. With color negative it's easier to keep the exposure and color match from on take to another. Color or exposure don't have to be really good but it would look bad if the scene suddenly changes color or brightness.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
The first modern colourfilms (Kodachrome and Agfacolor) were reversal films and marketed as cine films.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
The question has already been answered, but I have long been impressed how rigorous and demanding cinematography is. Just the differences and the reasons for them between a cine lens and a still camera lens, for example, is impressive.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,262
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
VNF! That's a blast from the past. I forgot about that, but it was 16mm and run straight through the telecine, was there a print material?

I was thinking about ECO in 16mm, I think it was ASA 25 tungsten? Needed a lotta light at 1/48 shutter speed.
 

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
The question has already been answered, but I have long been impressed how rigorous and demanding cinematography is. Just the differences and the reasons for them between a cine lens and a still camera lens, for example, is impressive.
Cinematographers always buy film from the same batch, and clip test every roll. This gives them exposure correct to a fraction of a stop and no colour shifts.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,968
Location
UK
Format
35mm
I would think that colour negative film would be the prefered medium because there is a greater latitude for any exposure errors. (not that there would be many)
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,443
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format
I would think that colour negative film would be the prefered medium because there is a greater latitude for any exposure errors. (not that there would be many)
It would be nice if I could get that latitude from reversal film but then I wouldn't be able to watch it on my projectors. I shoot most of my home movies on 8mm and Super 8 using my stockpile of Ektachrome 100D. If I shot it just to telecine it to digital then I would probably shoot negative film but half the fun is watching it with a projector.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom