cibachrome vs. fujiflex

Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
68
Format
Large Format
Anyone know if fujiflex will be as stable as cibachromes over time?
 

nickrapak

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
No. Someone will be along to explain better than I can, but a major part of the image stability of Ilfochrome/Cibachrome comes from both the high-purity Azo dyes embedded in the paper as well as the dye-destruction based P-5 process.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Last edited by a moderator:

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
Yep, Ilfo/Cibachrome is in a class by itself.

Dye-destruction, silver-dye-bleach processes are fundamentally different than color-coupler, chromogenic prints.

That's not to say that the latter's stability will be bad, but the former's stability is fantastic.
 

nickrapak

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
Ilfochrome/Cibachrome is not coated on paper. It is a white Melinex (DuPont's trade name for poyester).

EDIT: Apparently there is a resin coated paper version too: http://www.firstcall-photographic.co.uk/userfiles/file/ilfochrome.pdf


Steve.

I know it's not coated on paper, but "paper" is the common term for photographic printing material. Besides, the OP was comparing two polyester-base printing materials, so I assume he would know what I was referring to.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…