Change of Agitation - need advice for development time

Night Drive 2

D
Night Drive 2

  • 1
  • 0
  • 158
Night Drive 1

D
Night Drive 1

  • 1
  • 0
  • 166
Sonatas XII-49 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-49 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 521
市

A

  • 1
  • 3
  • 795
Approaching fall

D
Approaching fall

  • 7
  • 3
  • 1K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,706
Messages
2,795,458
Members
100,006
Latest member
Nadikahapu
Recent bookmarks
0

Dietmar Wolf

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
633
Location
switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Hi.

I usually agitate the first 30 sec continuously, then every 30 sec two times.
I have a jobo tank with 470 ml in it.

Due the fact that the development time recently got pretty long (I changed dilution of ID11), I want to agitate the first minute and then 4 times every minute.

(old) Development time is 14:20 min.

Do you think I have to lengthen shorten the time with the new rhythm?
Anyone experience?

Thanks.
 

Ray Heath

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
1,204
Location
Eastern, Aus
Format
Multi Format
g'day di
my practice and experience is to maintain the agitation routine regardless of the total time or dilution
 

Edwardv

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
396
Format
Medium Format
How about increasing your temperature for development, like 75 degrees.

Good luck.
 

Monophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
1,689
Location
Saratoga Spr
Format
Multi Format
Dietmar -

Maybe I'm missing something - - - but there must be a reason why you chose to increase the dilution of your developer. It would seem to me that in most cases, that would then dictate what you would want to do about agitation.

For example, one common reason to want to increase developer dilution is to compensate for higher contrast in the scene at the time of exposure. Increasing the agitation will increase negative contrast, so that would be exactly the wrong thing to do. In fact, to achieve optimum compensation with highly dilute developers, one might actually choose to decrease agitation, even to the point of what is sometimes referred to as "semi-stand" development in which the developing time is extended greatly (perhaps to an hour), but agitation is limited to the first few seconds and perhaps one short period about half-way through development.

Another common reason to want to increase developer dilution is to reduce the size of grain. Increasing agitation tends to increase grain size and would again not be appropriate.
 
OP
OP
Dietmar Wolf

Dietmar Wolf

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
633
Location
switzerland
Format
Multi Format
No. I already increased ID11 from stock to finally 1:2.
I am pleased with the result. I have the optimum, but still want to change agitation freuquency.

Now, I have the 14.20 min., but with 30 sec agitation.

I want to reduce just to do some minor things between agitation. Like prepare the stop and fixer...
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,482
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
If that's all you are looking to do, just interrupt your cycle for a few seconds and do it. If you miss one or two agitation rounds, it likely won't matter.
 

Rich Ullsmith

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
1,159
Format
Medium Format
Four times a minute, including the rap on the bench to loosen bubbles, along with the initial continuous minute. . .that's pretty labor intensive!
 

harri129

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
11
Format
35mm
Increasing the agitation from 2 cycles a minute to 4 cycles a minute is not likely to decrease developing time a lot. My guess would be 5% decrease in time, 10% decrease being unlikely. The rule of the thumb for continuous agitation is to decrease time 10-15% or so.

If you're happy with the results don't change it. All modifications change the results.

This is also true for changing the temperature. However, using a higher temperature is likely to affect developing time much more than the change in agitation you sugested.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,104
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
If you simply want to increase the interval between agitations to enable you to do other things, then try the Ilford recommended agitation cycle of first 10seconds then 10 seconds every minute. This usually gives me time to do the kind of things you mention. However it may change the look of the negs slightly but in my experience having used both your current method and the Ilford method the difference should be small.

pentaxuser

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP
Dietmar Wolf

Dietmar Wolf

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
633
Location
switzerland
Format
Multi Format
harri, you were right. Not much impact.

I now develop HP5 ASA between 250 and 320 ID11 1+2 with 15:00 min, first minute and then every minute 10 sec.
I will make my first prints of the first roll this wekend. So the results will be posted next week, I guess.

Isnt Ilford technique first minute continuous agitation?
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,104
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Isnt Ilford technique first minute continuous agitation?[/QUOTE]

I checked the Ilford data sheets again just to make sure I hadn't misread them. It definitely says 10 secs agitation( four inversions) initially then 10 secs every minute.

I imagine that a whole minute of agitation( so 50 secs more than recommended) initially then following the Ilford recommendation of 10 secs agitation every minute would produce different negs.

pentaxuser
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom