I'm in Tucson and went to the Feb. 15 opening and lecture. The show was quite nice, filled with lovely vintage prints from both the pictorial and straight photographers. It's up through May 4, and worth a visit if you're in the area.
The lecture was an experience. Susan Ehrens, "noted author, curator, and photography historian" repeatedly refered to the pictorial works as "out-of-focus", and at one point talked about how the f/64 work was made possible by advances in lens quality. The sad/funny part was when she talked about Alma Lavenson's "self portrait" (the cover image of Ehren's book on Lavenson, showing Lavenson's hands on the front of her camera, reflected in a mirror), she talked about the image being sharper than was possible with a soft focus lens. Guess what the lens was? Yep, a Cooke Series II soft focus, just shut down a ways...
Yeah, I know... I'm a lens nerd. But sometimes I can't help but notice that there's a complete disconnect between "scholarship" and "reality"...