Carl Zeiss BIOTAR 1.5 / 75mm does anybody have this lens?

haring

Member

Joined

Feb 2, 2011

Messages

287

Format

35mm

• Mar 4, 2013

• #1

I love the Carl Zeiss BIOTAR 75mm f/1.5 lens. I am thinking about buying one of them but I can see that there is a huge range in price for this lens. They seem the same to me. I am just wondering whether anybody can tell me which series of these lens I should buy to get the best image quality and what makes the price to range so wide...

 

rawhead

Member

Joined

Jun 18, 2009

Messages

588

Location

Boston, MA

Format

Medium Format

• Mar 4, 2013

• #2

Well, the Exakta mount version is more ubiquitous and harder to adapt so they *tend* to be slightly cheaper. M42 versions more expensive.

The conventional thought is that the "Pre-War" version gives nicer images; they are narrower/straighter than the post-war fatties:

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/manual-focus/Biotar

Owning both a post-war Biotar 75/1.5, and its soviet/russian copy, the Helios 40-2 85/1.5, I prefer the latter, which you can now get a new production one for $500 on Ebay.

 

OP

OP

haring

Member

Joined

Feb 2, 2011

Messages

287

Format

35mm

• Jun 3, 2013

• #3

Thanks so much! The Helios is not that expensive, actually, The pre-war biotar is super expensive...

 

EdSawyer

Member

Joined

Sep 3, 2008

Messages

1,793

Format

Multi Format

• Jun 3, 2013

• #4

I had a late-model T-coated fat biotar in M42 mount for a while. It was a nice lens, a bit of glow wide open but very sharp stopped down. Nice swirl in the bokeh. I paid $450 for it a few years ago, later sold it as I wasn't using it much. They seem to have gone up a fair bit in price since then.
-Ed

 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber

Joined

Jul 31, 2006

Messages

1,408

Format

Medium Format

• Jun 4, 2013

• #5

Yes the prices have become quite insane recently. I wanted this lens so bad when I was a teenager but was not able to afford. And it was only 1/3 then of what is paid now!