Hi, I would like to know how the original version of the Canonet QL17 is compared to the more popular and more frequently found QL17 G-III. I know the differences in spesifications and that it is a bit larger, but how they compare in terms of image quality and practical use is lacking (according to my research). Would I be better off staying clear of the original version if I was offered one for a good price, and in stead go for the newer G-III? Thank you in advance for input on this. Per-Chr.
Thank you for replying. The camera is on its way.
Actually, I think the one you're getting is "GII". The original Canonet without the QL (quick load) feature would be GI. Also, I think you'll like it. I use a zinc-air hearing aid cell in an O-ring with all but one of the airholes blocked off in my QL19.The first version, the Canonet QL17 with the 45mm f/1.7 lens. It's in excellent condition and comes with original leather case. As I also have a Canon P, I had second thoughts about the purchase because the G-III QL17 is lighter and smaller than the "G-I" QL17 and maybe the smaller one would complement my P better. I'll see in a few days.
My wind lever is silver. The second and third version (G-III) wind lever is black tiped. I'm pretty sure I have purchased the old version, that is the first QL17, not the original Canonet from 1961.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?