The only one I can find is this: https://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/fdlenses/35mmTS/35mmts.htm
It's SSC, but that's not a mount. It's a regular FD mount lens. The acronym SSC denotes the coatings used on the lens.
I'm also not familiar with a Canon E-mount - do you mean EF mount?
Guess I should have said breach lock type lens.
I would ask - why does it matter?
The FD mount didn't change between the breech lock era and the era that followed. All that really changed was how the lens, once mounted, was locked into that mount.
Perspective control lenses for mechanical mounts typically use a manual, preset aperture, not an automatic aperture, because the front part of the lens where the aperture is, is free to move with respect to the mount and a mechanical linkage would be extraordinarily complex. PC lenses for mounts with electronically controlled apertures may get around this limitation. PC lenses take some time to operate, so manual aperture setting is just another step in the process.
I also think you might be talking about the difference between FL and FD mounts. There are FD breechlock lenses.
The only Canon breech lock I've used did not meter in aperture priority and was always in stop down mode on the F-1 which made focusing accuracy debatable. I never liked working in stopped down mode, but sometimes that just how it goes.
However, as another poster has mentioned, a tilt-shift FD lens probably can't offer open aperture metering, because with the tilt-shift mechanism involved, there would be no way of maintaining the required mechanical connection between the aperture setting mechanism in the lens and the open aperture metering lever on the camera and mount.
The New FD shift lens was manual aperture control, not automatic like the other FD lenses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?