. . . although they only made the T90 for around one year in 1986 . . .
One small point:
On APUG, referring to a T90 as "old" may confuse some of the regular contributors.
I've never seen one with anything other than the code for 1986 in the film chamber of a T90 and this bears this out http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/canont90/index.htm and says "it had barely a year to survive"I don't believe this is correct. Many people confuse the introduction of the EOS system with the discontinuation of all things FD, when actually there was an overlap. My data indicates that the T90 was manufactured from 1986 to 1990, possibly 1991. The Canon Camera Museum shows a brochure for the T90 with a 1990 date on it . . .
I can tell you this for certain because I remember it happening -- when Canon announced the discontinuation of the T90 in 1991, dealers' stocks were sold out in just a few days time.
I've never seen one with anything other than the code for 1986 in the film chamber of a T90 and this bears this out http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/canont90/index.htm and says "it had barely a year to survive"
Mir is a good source for many things FD. To their credit, they have amassed a great deal of data on the subject, but that does not make them the definitive source. In fact, when I did a google search on the subject, I got a bunch of hits that had the exact same wording as Mir's site. So obviously this little assumption is being circulating without anyone bothering to check factuality, since nobody is citing a source. As for your seeing only 1986 date codes, that is anecdotal information and cannot be construed to be a cumulative answer on the subject. It also does not explain why Canon would print a brochure on the T90 in 1990. What, do you think Canon had the reserve manufacturing capacity to manufacture a four-year supply for a top-selling camera?
I used to be a camera dealer back in the late 80s through the mid-90s. I bought and sold used photo equipment. One of the hottest cameras a dealer could get his hands on was a clean T90. They sold like wildfire. By that time the EOS 650 was already being regarded as obsolete and wasn't terribly popular at the shows. So yes, even in the late 80s and early 90s, the T90 was still a good selling camera.
I agree the T90 wouldn't be my first choice for shooting street and I tend to use other FD cameras that aren't motor driven, I find that that the T90 for a motor driven camera isn't exceptionally loud and in down town areas the ambient street noise is so loud that it's rarely a problem, and the mirror damping is so good it doesn't produce an excessive amount of vibration.I loved almost everything about mine. The viewfinder was especially good, making focusing very fast and easy. Ergonomically excellent, all around. There was one thing that made me sell it, though. It was loud. In fact, so loud that discreet street photography wasn't really possible without attracting attention. If that is not an issue for you, it's one of the greatest manual focus cameras.
In additionthe Canon focusing screen FN "S" spot screens for the New F1 have a 3° angle of view.I've owned my T90 from new since 1987. It was service by Canon Australia in 1999 and has had light use since as I'm enjoying
a Canon EF and an F1-N more these days.
My T90 often doesn't get used for several months at a time but I have not experienced any of the misbehaving shutter problems
or the dreaded EEEE display. Although it has no foam in the camera back, excepting the 'Judas' window that shows film type, my
biggest area of concern would be any internal foam that gets stuck on the shutter curtains. I have heard of this problem but I don't
know where the foam would come from. (Unless it is the foam surrounding the window on the camera back. Might have to preemptively
replace this foam).
I trust my T90 but I would be wary of buying one second-hand at this stage in it's life. It's the camera body I choose if I'm in the mood
for spot metering with 35mm, (F1-N with P screens give 12% partial metering pattern - nearly as useful), or I want TTL flash. I don't shoot
motor sports any more so the winder is irrelevant.
In Japan the T90 was widely used by photojournalists, earning the name "the tank" and gaining a reputation for reliability. Most of its failures are caused by being not used, sometimes for decades.I've owned a T90 for about 20 years and it's always worked faultlessly but I have never trusted it, if I needed to come back with pictures not excuses and if my livelihood and that of my family depended on it I would rather use my New F1's.
The second and more serious problem concerns the shutter. The T90's shutter appears to develop a 'sticky' nature as the camera ages. It is prone to locking up, in which case the camera's LCD displays "EEE" and the message "HELP" appears in the viewfinder display. This is commonly called the "EEE syndrome" among users. The problem is most likely to crop up after the camera has been left unused for some time; thus, the best way to prevent it is regular use of the camera. It does not seem to cause inaccurate shutter speeds before failure. The problem can be corrected by a knowledgeable technician without replacing the shutter mechanism. It is reportedly caused by dirt on the shutter's magnets affecting their performance.In Japan the T90 was widely used by photojournalists, earning the name "the tank" and gaining a reputation for reliability. Most of its failures are caused by being not used, sometimes for decades.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?