I had a T90 back in the mid to late '90s. I bought it used, with a data back. It had seen a lot of use already before I got it, but I never had a problem with it. It was a good camera. I sold it in order to buy an EOS 3.
The EOS 3 was a good camera too, but it didn't take me long to regret selling the T90. I could use all my FD mount lenses with the T90. I never manged to build up a comparable set of EF mount lenses, and frankly, I found I preferred the build quality of the FD lenses. The autofocus on the EOS 3, the main reason why I bought it, was also a disappointment to me. I still have and occasionally use the EOS 3, but I really wish I still had my T90.
I might be wrong about this, but I seem to recall that there was only one Canon flash that would work with the T90. The 300TL. I had that flash, and when it went out, I was never able to find a working replacement. The camera lacks a PC sync socket too.
If you buy a T90, keep in mind that you might have a hard time locating parts for it if it ever needs repair.
I agree, I have three of them.T-90 is a great camera, get one!
Jeff
Well I have started something here, and I did not expect so many replies in such a short time. It looks as though the majority are recommending I acquire one, because they still own one, or they did have one and have regretted selling it.
The only faults or potential faults are the two I have raised in my original post, ie the internal battery, and the 'sticky magnets'. But from the subsequent postings the battery is nothing to worry about - if it fails the LCD will not give a reading when the main batteries are not installed. The magnet problem can and should be prevented by firing the shutter on occasions when the T90 is stored for a period of time. Plus benjiboy's "unique" suggestion for the same problem - worth noting and bearing in mind.
I think after reading all the comments above I will be going for a T90.
Thanks,
pityacka.
That's right Matt, although they only made the T90 for around one year in 1986 it was about twenty years ahead of it's time and was the concept that just about all of the modern SLR s are based on both film and digital, to me it's still the height of sophistication even after twenty five years.One small point:
On APUG, referring to a T90 as "old" may confuse some of the regular contributors.
I love the EOS3, but agree with you. I had a T90, and it has all the features of the ESO3 + BPE2 for 1Kg less ! I loved mine until it failed with the EEE error, and it is now out of repair
If you buy one, you won't be disappointed !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?