Canon FD RMC Tokina 28/2.8 vs Vivitar 28/2.8 experiences?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,354
Messages
2,790,223
Members
99,880
Latest member
koothooloo
Recent bookmarks
1

Boris Mirkov

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
84
Location
Serbia, Belgrade
Format
Multi Format
Does anyone have any experience with these lenses? Tokina is sold for about 40 euros while Vivitar is 20, both in pretty good shape.
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,770
Format
35mm
Tokina lenses made for Vivitar have a serial number starting with 37. Some Vivitars of the same focal length and speed are the same as the comparable Tokina models and some are not. Assuming that both lenses are in good condition the Vivitars to look for will have serial numbers starting with 37 (Tokina) , 22 (Kino) and 28 (Komine). I would avoid a 28/2.8 Vivitar with a serial number starting with 9 or 09. If you see 9 or 09 then get the Tokina RMC. In any case, the Tokina RMC is a decent lens.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,977
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
I don't have any experience of these lenses,but you can buy a genuine Canon FD 28 mm f2.8 lenses so cheap these days there should be no need to buy these independent ones of unknown quality.
 

snapguy

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,287
Location
California d
Format
35mm
don't be fooled

Don't be fooled into thinking a "third party" lens is necessarily not as good as a name brand. The sharpest lens I have ever owned is a Vivitar and I have owned plenty of Leitz, Nikon and Canon lenses.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,977
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Don't be fooled into thinking a "third party" lens is necessarily not as good as a name brand. The sharpest lens I have ever owned is a Vivitar and I have owned plenty of Leitz, Nikon and Canon lenses.[/QUOTE
That can be so, but these days the difference in price between a marque FD lens and an off brand lens is often be quite small, and with Canon you know pretty well what you're getting for your money.
 

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
The sharpest 28 I owned was a Kiron 2.8. However I agree with benjiboy that unless you're sure the 3rd party lens is brilliant, the equivalent Canon isn't very expensive.
 

fstop

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,121
Format
35mm
I don't have any experience of these lenses,but you can buy a genuine Canon FD 28 mm f2.8 lenses so cheap these days there should be no need to buy these independent ones of unknown quality.

I agree
 

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
If the "RMC" on the Tokina is printed in GREEN, I'll have good glass w/brilliance; the Vivitar won't.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,153
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Hey, if the guys says thats what is available, that is what available. dont give him a hard time.

That said, I dont know much about the two lenses , but i would say to be patient and look for a canon brand.
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
I've used the Vivitar 28/2.5 but not the 2.8. Both the 62mm and 67mm filter thread versions and they have been brilliant with lack of flare control being the main issue for me. I like contre jour so I I may be more critical than others on this.
 
OP
OP
Boris Mirkov

Boris Mirkov

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
84
Location
Serbia, Belgrade
Format
Multi Format
Thank you all for the replies, I think I will have to find a way to test them to see what suits me best since there is little info online on both these lenses.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom