Canon EOS Mounted to Telescope

Duceman

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
660
Location
Home
Format
Multi Format
I have an old Jason 324 Saturn telescope. I'm guessing it's vintage to be early 70's. It's great for viewing the moon (though it does not have any computerized motor for tracking).

I saw some adapters for mounting a 35mm camera onto the telescope so as to take moonshots. Specifically, I'd be looking for an adapter to fit Canon EF mount. I see that there are several available on Amazon at different prices.

Has anyone ever done this? If so, how were the results?
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
reI think most adapters for telescopes are T mount, but check yours first. They should be an adapter for a T to EF adapter. You might want to go to one of the websites that specialize in telescope photography, those folks do this sort of thing all the time.

If old telescope lenses are like camera lenses from that era, you probably have pretty decent optics on yours.
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
By all accounts, a nice, solid, metal scope with decent optics. That's the plus side.

Downside is the eyepiece looks to be 1.25". This will probably vignette a bit.

Standard connection is EOS --> T-Mount --> 1.25" eyepiece adapter. This effectively turns your telescope into a lens for your Canon. Note that you're not getting the magnification from your eyepieces-- whatever the focal length is, that's what you've got-- In this case, it seems to be 1200mm, so that's not bad.

It appears to be about f/15, however, so that's a bit dim. Fortunately, the sun isn't, and the light reflected from the moon is pretty bright.
 
OP
OP

Duceman

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
660
Location
Home
Format
Multi Format
momus said:
If old telescope lenses are like camera lenses from that era, you probably have pretty decent optics on yours.
Click to expand...

Thanks.

The glass on the telescope seems quite nice.


Thanks.

There's a reason why these telescopes come with a "moon filter" as when the moon is full, it is quite bright. f/15 shouldn't be a problem for a full moon... at least I don't think it should. The moon is, however, a moving object, so hopefully I can get the shutter speed fast enough without any blur (even if only slight blur).
 
Last edited:

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,654
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

I tried this with an icon and it turn out that a camera of the size as far too heavy mounted to a telescope. which makes observation close to impossible. How far better option seems to be a dedicated eye-piece scamera.
 

cooltouch

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
1,677
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, dedicated digit*l eyepiece cameras are by far the most popular nowadays, but back in the day, film was the only choice, and 35mm was considered optimum. But because camera weight was often an issue, telescope operators preferred small, light cameras. The Oly OM-1 became a very popular camera for telescope use because of its small size. Also, despite it not having a manual mode except 1/90 and B, the Nikon EM had become popular for the same reason -- because 1/90 and B were enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…