Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM vs Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 "L"

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 4
  • 5
  • 36
Couples

A
Couples

  • 3
  • 0
  • 70
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 4
  • 4
  • 98
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 117

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,043
Messages
2,785,253
Members
99,791
Latest member
EBlz568
Recent bookmarks
1

redstarjedi

Member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
181
Format
35mm
I'm a contax snob making the transition from a contax SLR (i'm keeping my G1 and G2 till i die) to a canon SLR system. I borrowed a friends Canon EF 35mm 1.4 "L", i shot a few rolls of provia and tri-x. I was blown away by how sharp the lens is and it's ability to resolve detail, and again i'm a contax snob so that says a lot.

The "L" 35 is out of my price range, and i see the new 35 f/2 a lot on line. I've read a million reviews, and i've seen the 5D comparison shots between the two. But a few questions remain:

Has any film shooters out there used both lenses? If so, is the f/2 just as sharp as the 1.4? Is the rendering the same? Does anyone have any comparison shots, on film ? And yes, i know comparing a 1.4 to a f/2 is not exactly fair.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom