Can You Tell From Your Prints It's Time For A New Batch Of Developer Or From The Developer Itself?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,130
Messages
2,786,676
Members
99,818
Latest member
stammu
Recent bookmarks
0

DF

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
589
I use batches of developer (Ilford Multigrade) multiple times with good results, even when it starts looking orange or amber. 'Comes a time when prints have an odd "faded" look about them, and wonder if developer has become "weak", and should be dumped down the drain. Yet I've had satisfactory results even when it bocomes that amber color. What ages or weakens developer - of course it's the using/reusing, but exposure to air? Heating each time for re-use?
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,482
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
No, FB paper is expensive..... re-doing prints costs both time & money. I don't re-use chemicals and I am careful to observe the amount of prints i run through. That goes both for developer & fixer.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
With any developer, if the print starts taking too long to develop, I put the print in a tray of water, dump the developer, mix new developer, refill the washed tray and put the print back into the new developer.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,184
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
I use developers that can be used the next day by covering the trays w/ saran wrap. There's several that allow that, so that cuts costs down a little.

The developers will tell you the maximum number of prints that's possible. I don't keep records, put do count the prints that had been in the soup at the end of a session.

15, 11x14 prints is about my limit for 1 night of printing, and less for FB because of the longer wash times and longer times in the developer. It doesn't pay to stretch things beyond the developer's recommendations.

Don't ask me why I know that :[
 
Last edited:

snusmumriken

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,522
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
What GregY said + 1. I would say the advantages of using developer always within the manufacturer's recommended limits are (1) a fresh crisp image; (2) repeatability.

If your reason for using beyond that limit is budget, you might consider a home-brew, perhaps? Or consider buying 5 litres MG developer at a time, which is much cheaper. Then on opening, re-bottle it into smaller amounts, with protective gas. For example, I bought a set of 500 ml and 20ml glass bottles. I divide 5 litres into 8 x 500 ml bottles and 5 x 200 ml bottles. When the small bottles are all used, I open another 500 ml bottle and sub-divide that. I got the tip from a long thread about protective gas on the FADU forum here. I am still working my way through the first 5 litres, but so far the bottles have kept perfectly.
 

jnamia

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
185
Location
local
Format
Multi Format
you can test your developer by taking a scrap of paper and make a test strip with no negative in the enlarger and develop it, you can also test your developer by taking a coin and putting it on your scrap of paper and turn the room lights on then develop it and see if you get blacks. life's too short to use spent chemicals, and they usually aren't too expensive ... I get sprint by the cube it's cheap..
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom