Can anyone recommend me a light meter?

tron_ · Sep 10, 2012

So I have been doing some push shooting lately (1600 on XP2 Super) as well as long exposures with my Mamiya RZ67. The problem is that the Dejur Dual Professional meter I have been using only goes up to 800 and does not have very clear low light readings.

Therefore I decided it might be time to look into a nice electronic light meter (possibly Sekonic). Can anyone recommend me a meter that is in the $250 range? I really do not want to spend more than that on a meter

CGW · Sep 10, 2012

Used Sekonics to look at are the 358 and smaller, less expensive 308. Either are within your price range. Both are tough, reliable and accurate.

Dan Daniel · Sep 10, 2012

Sekonic L-308.... S, maybe? I think the versions are B, S, and D? Anyway, I have a 308B, earlier version, and it is my daily meter. Goes in a jacket pocket, always ready to be pulled out to check. I use it on incident all the time. Large simple readout. I set a shutter speed based on my basic shooting conditions and do the math if I need to make a change. Meaning that, for example, if it tells me that at 1/125 I should be shooting at 2.0, and I want to shoot at f5.6, I use 1/15. Simple enough... well, it works for me, a simple readout of a shutter speed and an aperture. Some people might prefer dials and such.

kbrede · Sep 10, 2012

Do you want spot or incident or both? I wanted both 1 degree spot and incident and ended up purchasing a Sekonic L-508. They don't make them anymore, but you can pick one up used on ebay.

BrianShaw · Sep 10, 2012

There is nothing that beats an old Luna Pro for low light metering. Decent ones, plus the battery converter, will be well within your price range. Reflected plus incident reading.

If the calculator doesn't go high enough figuring out a 1-stop or 2-stop adjustment is easy enough to do in one's head.

But haven't we dealt with this question before or am I having dejavu all over again????

M.A.Longmore · Sep 10, 2012

.
The Olde Luna Pro is the way to go !
I eBayed a Luna Pro, and Spot Attachment for less than $30.00.
I use the Radio Shack Zinc Air batteries, no adapters necessary.
I keep trying to find an excuse to upgrade to a more expensive meter ...

Ron
.

BrianShaw · Sep 10, 2012

M.A.Longmore said:
.

I keep trying to find an excuse to upgrade to a more expensive meter ...

A few years ago I "upgraded" to a more expensive "does everything" meter (Sekonic L-558) and only get value from that upgrade when doing flash or 1-degree spot metering. I probably could have done just as well continuing to use the Gossen 7/15 deg spot attachment and cheap flash meter.

E. von Hoegh · Sep 10, 2012

M.A.Longmore said:
.
The Olde Luna Pro is the way to go !
I eBayed a Luna Pro, and Spot Attachment for less than $30.00.
I use the Radio Shack Zinc Air batteries, no adapters necessary.
I keep trying to find an excuse to upgrade to a more expensive meter ...

Ron
.

Good luck with that. I've been looking for the same excuse since the last millenium....

dnjl · Sep 10, 2012

I have a Sekonic L-308S and I would definitely recommend it if you don't need spot metering. It does incident and reflected metering, as well as flash. Relatively small and light and fairly robust, even though it feels plasticky. The meter takes readily available batteries which last for ages. It's cheap, too.

Timestep · Sep 10, 2012

Gossen Digi-Pro F: Incident or reflectance. Flash if ever needed. AA battery.
Put that in a Lowe FS10 belt pouch.

TheFlyingCamera · Sep 10, 2012

Not much bigger than the Sekonic 308 is the 408 - another discontinued model you can find on eBay. It does incident, reflected, 5-degree spot and flash. Uses a single AA battery, and is weatherproof and somewhat ruggedized (no, you don't want to repeatedly bounce it off rocks - it will break like any other - but the occasional bump and bang will do it little to no harm. I have two of them (one's a backup) and they've both been dragged around and knocked into stuff and come through with flying colors). They can also be user calibrated to match personal preferences or another meter. This is a big plus if you sometimes use an in-camera meter, or you have standardized your exposure/development routine around another meter which you are replacing with this.

tron_ · Sep 10, 2012

Thanks for the replies guys, I appreciate the help. I will look into the Sekonic L-308S and L-408. I don't really need spot metering because I rarely (if ever) use it. I will be fine with incident and reflected metering. Flash would be a bonus.

I think it's safe to say that whatever I go with will be better than toting around my DSLR and using it for long exposure metering haha.

TheFlyingCamera · Sep 10, 2012

Especially for shooting long time exposures, a DSLR is bad because digital doesn't have reciprocity, so it's easy to forget that you need to calculate it if you use the DSLR as a pseudo-Polaroid.

Ali-C · Sep 10, 2012

I got an L408 off of ebay for £125, okay it has a 5 degree instead of a 1 degree spot, but if you can't stretch to the 508 or the 758 it's very good for the money. TheFlyingCamera pretty much covered it all in his post.

Matus Kalisky · Sep 10, 2012

I have been using Gossen Digisix since about 3 years and it is a great little device. VERY simple to use, once you measured the EV value you get all possible shutter-aperture combinations at the same time. and it does reflected metering with about 30 degree cone. And it is tiny, has built-in countdown timer, clock alarm and thermometer (should you need any of those additional features)

It is one of very few things in photography I got new and kept this long

tron_ · Sep 10, 2012

TheFlyingCamera said:
Especially for shooting long time exposures, a DSLR is bad because digital doesn't have reciprocity, so it's easy to forget that you need to calculate it if you use the DSLR as a pseudo-Polaroid.

That is a very good point, does the L-408 compensate for reciprocity? Or is there a built in feature for it? (I understand that reciprocity is different for each film so I'm going to assume no but I've been surprised before).

BrianShaw · Sep 10, 2012

Good assumption. I know of no meter that compensates for reciprocity. I'd be surprised, as in REALLY SURPRISED, if someone knows of one that does.

Chan Tran · Sep 10, 2012

BrianShaw said:
Good assumption. I know of no meter that compensates for reciprocity. I'd be surprised, as in REALLY SURPRISED, if someone knows of one that does.

With today fast microprocessor it's not difficult to build such a meter but you would have to program in the reciprocity characteristic of the film you use as they are all different. But then as film use isn't that much popular any more it would be hard to recoup the development cost.

E. von Hoegh · Sep 11, 2012

Chan Tran said:
With today fast microprocessor it's not difficult to build such a meter but you would have to program in the reciprocity characteristic of the film you use as they are all different. But then as film use isn't that much popular any more it would be hard to recoup the development cost.

So, you can use a basic LunaPro and the reciprocity chart from your film's datasheet, or develop a meter containing a microprocessor. To borrow a line from Thomas Earnshaw, it seems like going around back of a house and breaking open the back door while the front door stands open. That is, finding the most complex solution available for a dirt-simple problem.

TheFlyingCamera · Sep 11, 2012

Actually, it wouldn't be very hard to program something like that at all- there's already several light meter apps for the iPhone. wouldn't be hard to modify one of them to let you select a film type and automatically curve the exposure.

E. von Hoegh · Sep 11, 2012

TheFlyingCamera said:
Actually, it wouldn't be very hard to program something like that at all- there's already several light meter apps for the iPhone. wouldn't be hard to modify one of them to let you select a film type and automatically curve the exposure.

Using an iphone as a meter is yet another example of needless and counterproductive complication.

benjiboy · Sep 11, 2012

I would recommend the Gossen Digi Pro F , it has a 30 degree acceptance for reflected light, it's lightweight,slim and pocketable, very quick and easy to use, runs off a single AA battery, has an analogue as well as a digital display to 1/10th of a stop, and has a way of easily assessing scene contrast, above all it's deadly accurate
http://www.wexphotographic.com/Home...L-_-_cat:wexphotographic.com&gclid=CJOc-vvirb

tron_ · Sep 11, 2012

Thanks for the tip onto the Gossen DigiPro F. I'm pretty sure I've narrowed my choices down to the Sekonic L-408, L-308S, and the Gossen DigiPro F. Considering these are all in my budget, which one do you guys feel would be the best bang for the buck?

Also, as an engineer, I wouldn't mind coming up with a little light meter that accounts for reciprocity it actually wouldn't be too difficult, you could perform a curve-fitting analysis on each films reciprocity curve, and then use the function to interpolate and convert the metered readings through the function, and output the accounted-for exposure

baachitraka · Sep 11, 2012

You can get Gossen Digisix and spend the rest money on film and paper.

Reflective Metering: Can follow Minor White's technique to start with.

Incident Metering: BTZS.

Viele Gruesse.

Frank C · Sep 11, 2012

BrianShaw said:
There is nothing that beats an old Luna Pro for low light metering. Decent ones, plus the battery converter, will be well within your price range. Reflected plus incident reading.

I agree.

Can anyone recommend me a light meter?

tron_

CGW

Dan Daniel

kbrede

BrianShaw

M.A.Longmore

BrianShaw

E. von Hoegh

dnjl

Timestep

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council

tron_

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council

Ali-C

Matus Kalisky

tron_

BrianShaw

Chan Tran

E. von Hoegh

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council

E. von Hoegh

benjiboy

tron_

baachitraka

Frank C

Can anyone recommend me a light meter?

Membership Council

Membership Council

Membership Council

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency