Not everything labeled "Leitz" is "Leica". Us Leica "buffs" have learned that before there were any "Leica" cameras, there were and are "Leitz" microscopes for which these were probably made. They too, are well regarded by people who use such things........Regards!Can anyone identify this Leica item?
I think it's an empty bottle for lubrication in the factory or for use with Leica Microscopes in the lab. There are three pieces: the glass bottle, the glass stopper, and the glass pipette.
Leica magic potion bottle?
But balsom would leave a mess, thus residues on the old bottle. And I do not think that spade applicator is that much more crude than what I linked to as modern versions.
But anyway whatever it contained, it just seems a bottle/applicator in microscopy. I know there are people interested in historic microscope but I doubt the guys are as extreme as ours. And even on our field some Leica products are offerd for just a few Euros.
But Karl showed me wrong in this very case...
Thanks, everyone, for your comments.It's a nice little thing, but I doubt it's worth a fortune. Leitz microscopes have always been of high quality, but. maybe because they are almost always spend their life as "standard workhorses" in research and medical laboratories , the microscopes and accessories don't seem to have the interest of the cameras, which can appeal to both collectors and users.
I guess anything with the name Leitz or Leica has value to a collector.
Can anyone identify this Leica item?
I think it's an empty bottle for lubrication in the factory or for use with Leica Microscopes in the lab. There are three pieces: the glass bottle, the glass stopper, and the glass pipette.
I thought the hollow stem is just a container for the spade, to keep it safe of too much liquid (balsam).This is a double bottle for immersion oil (inner flask with pipette) and a cleaning fluid for that (outer flask).
I thought the hollow stem is just a container for the spade, to keep it safe of too much liquid (balsam).
I do not see any pipette, but just a spade.
If there were two fluids, two applicators would be needed. One applicator, for both an oil and a solvent does not make sense, as in no time the solvent would be contaminated by the oil.
I am puzzled.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?