Hello, I posted this as my introduction to Photrio but I am reposting here in case anyone can advise.
My name is Peter. I am a newcomer and beginner trying to make a Chloro-Bromide projection paper emulsion using a recipe from Denise Ross' wonderful book 'The Light Farm'.
I am substituting the gleatine with PVOH, sometimes also mixing in PVA.
My watercolour paper is subbed with PVA, but still my emulsion wants to dissolve in processing (even if I leave out the stop).
Where I have got an image, the finished product is 'Slow, fragile and has a short life' just as Ilford said it would be.
I've tried adding talc, cornflour, agar agar at various stages.
Any leads would be gratefully appreciated!
Thank you in advance.
Hi Niranjan, Thank you for the link. I see he stirs for a lot longer than me which is helpful. The link also led me to find PE talking about Mark Ostermann and PVA, also very helpful and new ideas to try.Have you seen this work? It's POP, print-out process, but might be helpful for your develop-out paper:
:Niranjan
P.S. Welcome to Photrio!
Hi Donald,
Yes, I don't want to use animal products, but I'm also fascinated with the idea of an alternative to gelatine. I don't know of any other products to try. What would you use to harden agar? Do you mean to increase the viscosity?
The emulsions I have made have been quite runny and are hard to coat using a coating bar or well, so thicker would be and advantage for that reason alone.
Many thanks, Peter
Another one of Jim Patterson's processes uses sodium alginate (from kelp.)
Kelp carbon process – A direct positive carbon photographic process – AlternativePhotography.com
www.alternativephotography.com
Might get some more ideas...
:Niranjan
Gum arabic.
Agar is a pain in the butt to work with, at least that is my experience with it and carbon transfer... and it's expensive.
One of the fortuitous properties of gelatin that makes it perfect for photo emulsions is that it is insoluble, but swellable at room temperature and soluble at higher temperature. So emulsion can be prepared and applied at temperatures above room temperature but it sets on cool down. During processing, it swells again allowing the chemistry to go in and out without itself falling apart and washing away. So the replacement would have to have this critical property. Gum is soluble at room temperature so it would do the same thing as what you are seeing with PVOH. I would say PVOH might still have potential if you play around with the molecular weight and the hydrolysis percent. Particularly look for a grade that requires heat to dissolve.
:Niranjan.
Thanks Niranjan,
I was drawn to PVOH because KODAK patented so many unused formulas featuring it. I didn't realise there were grades that reacted differently to temperature.
Hi Andrew,
Have you used Agar as an alternative to gelatine?
Thanks, Peter
Oh and another idea I have is what if you treat your current PVOH emulsion with borax (essentially making slime) would it stabilize it for wet processing. Perhaps even add it to the developer. Just a thought...don't know what it would do to the other aspect of the process, though.
:Niranjan.
Yes, I have. I wasn't fond of it as I had setting issues... and more expensive than gelatine. I managed to make one print though.
Hi Andrew, Did you coat paper with the Agar emulsion? May I ask what you used to coat the paper? Was it much thinner than gelatine? What was the print like and was it just one print out of many attempts?
Sorry so many questions!
Hi Niranjan,
I didn't know that PVOH and now I'm wondering about the viscosity and hydrolysis of the compound I bought. Will find out when I get back to the darkroom. Yes, I think it would be an advantage to have something not dissolve at room temperature.
Will try the borax idea too. What brought borax to mind? Have you used it in processing?
Many thanks, Peter
I know at least one major manufacturer of photographic emulsions has experimented successfully with gelatin-free emulsions. It can be done, but I don't know what materials they used for the successful tests. It hasn't gone into production because it was really hard/impossible to beat the relatively low cost of gelatin.
Peter, keep in mind Andrew is talking about carbon transfer prints. Those work fundamentally differently from silver halide emulsions. I'm not sure to what extent Andrew's experience with agar-based carbon (or kelp carbon, gum etc.) can be extrapolated to silver halide emulsions. While some of the material properties of the colloid used overlap for both process families, the inner workings are really radically different.
Ha yes, thanks for all the extra details. Much appreciated.I size with acrylic medium. I got decent transfers after a few attempts, although I had to make a few adjustments to my workflow, such as mating the exposed tissue and substrate as soon as I put them in the water, gently squeegeeing, processing right away (mate no wait method) in cold water. Then develop in warm water... Sorry, I can't remember the exact temp but not hot like when gelatin is used. The prints were tonally nice but with zero relief. Zero. I quickly went back to gelatin.
Take it for what it's worth and I have no further information, but you might be able to dig something up:
View attachment 348530
"Cassell's Cyclopaedia of Photography, Edited by Bernard E. Jones. (1911), reprinted by Arno Press, 1973.
I do know that Logwood is available on many sites as a dye-stuff for cloth, so it's available...
EDIT: Ooops, thought you might have posted this to avoid using animal-based gelatin, but I appear to be mistaken. I'll leave it up in case anyone else finds it interesting. Apologies!
In any event, the book title is a link to an online scanned version of the original book which as a huge amount of information on printing processes. You might find your answers there! Good luck.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?