The EF as you write Theo is a little known model even amongst camera enthusiasts and they can still be bought for reasonable prices, when it was introduced in 1973 ( the A series didn't come out until 1976 ) it had the same build quality as original F1 but a much more sensitive shutter priority AE Silicon cell metering system than the F1's Selenium metering together with a hybrid vertical running electro/mechanical shutter that would work mechanically at most speeds even if the battery failed. My EF with the FD 35mm f2 is my go-to camera for street shooting and it's great.As for nomenclature, I think Canon made a mistake with the wonderful Canon EF. They had the F series and the A series and the EF just got lost; many people don't know it exists. I didn't know it existed until a few years ago (thanks, Ben!). It doesn't help that their EOS system lenses are called EF lenses.
A handy timeline reference for Minolta, Canon, Nikon Pentax:
http://minolta.eazypix.de/slrtable/
So now Nikon has Z cameras, Z lenses and Canon has EOS R cameras and RF lenses. We'll see what becomes of that, but I suspect it's the End.
The EF as you write Theo is a little known model even amongst camera enthusiasts and they can still be bought for reasonable prices, when it was introduced in 1973 ( the A series didn't come out until 1976 ) it had the same build quality as original F1 but a much more sensitive shutter priority AE Silicon cell metering system than the F1's Selenium metering together with a hybrid vertical running electro/mechanical shutter that would work mechanically at most speeds even if the battery failed. My EF with the FD 35mm f2 is my go-to camera for street shooting and it's great.
F = Focal plane shutter. M = Merkwürdigliebe. Which means Strangelove, whoops wrong movie. Leica M means MESSSUCHER. Eyes wide open?
Funny!!!Messucher = mesucker= take my monet
The EF... had the same build quality as original F1 but a much more sensitive shutter priority AE Silicon cell metering system than the F1's Selenium metering
The F-1, like most other Japanese SLRs of its era, had a CdS meter cell, not selenium.
I've been around cameras long enough to remember the EF very well, from when it was a current model. The EF was a one-off, a dead end for Canon. Internally it was a very complex camera, expensive to build. The AE-1 that most immediately replaced it, though heavily promoted for its automated features (does anyone else remember all the ads with John Newcombe?), was from the perspective of camera technology primarily an exercise in reducing manufacturing cost.
I remember the Canon advertisement that said the EF was "particularly suitable for old people".
The EF was an all-metal professional quality camera and cost almost as much as the F1 in 1976, the AE1 was a consumer camera made mainly of polycarbonate by automatic machines your friend got a bargain, you're a lucky man Chan.I have 2 of those EF.
Back in 76 a friend of mine when shopping for his first camera and was looking for the AE-1. The dealer has an EF and offered him a much lower price for the EF so he bought it. A year later he still think he got cheated by the salesman talked him into buying the EF so he bought the AE-1. His EF is barely used and he gave it to me later one.
The EF ... had the same build quality as original F1 ...
The EF was an all-metal professional quality camera and cost almost as much as the F1 in 1976, the AE1 was a consumer camera made mainly of polycarbonate by automatic machines your friend got a bargain, you're a lucky man Chan.
The AE-1 got a cast metal chassis and I doubt there is any Polycarbonate part at it at all.
No, the covers are from galvanized ABS.
Isn't that plastic?No, the covers are from galvanized ABS.
Isn't that plastic?
Yes, but galvanized ...
There's a story, possibly apocryphal, that circulates periodically about the Canon F-1. In brief, Nikon had the F and F2, but never bothered to trademark F-1. Canon saw the opportunity and took it.
The only feature the AE-1 has over the EF is its capable of motor winder but only a slow 2fps winder. Otherwise the EF is much nicer. I have the AE-1 too I the EF is definitely the better camera.Thank you for the confirmation, that is my impression as well. I've been using mine constantly this year; it is so enjoyable. I do get good battery life with it also - I switch it off when I'm finished with a series of photos.
Time now to switch to my F-1N - astounding build quality on that one.
The only feature the AE-1 has over the EF is its capable of motor winder...
The first "F" designated SLR was....
Praktika FX (1952)
Yeah but Pepper has a PhD and Pibb is just a regular guy.The same reason the real thing is called Dr Pepper, and the knockoff is called Mr Pibb...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?