Calculating triple convertible length

Flannigan's Pass

A
Flannigan's Pass

  • 0
  • 1
  • 23
Out Houses

D
Out Houses

  • 3
  • 0
  • 18
Simply leaves

H
Simply leaves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 32

Forum statistics

Threads
198,981
Messages
2,784,061
Members
99,761
Latest member
Hooper
Recent bookmarks
0

rrankin

Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
865
Location
La Plata, Mi
Format
Large Format
I got an old triple convertible today with a camera. It has the aperture scale for the two lenses, plus their combined length, but doesn't have the focal length of the third 'combined' length listed. The front lens is 23", rear is 17" and the combined is... Well, maybe it DID have the combined focal length but that is where the hole was drilled to mount the scale plate.

Obviously I can put it on a camera and focus at infinity with the combined lenses.

I can also tell because the max aperture opening is 1" and the max for the combined lenses is f8.

I can tell by looking at the scale and seeing that about f8.x on the combined aperture scale is about f16 on the 17" scale, so it's about half.


Since I don't have my Stroebel book in the USA to research this, and I was curious, I thought someone here will know this off the top of their head - given 2 arbitrary lenses in front and rear, how is the combined focal length calculated?

Or conversely, given that you want X focal length, how do you calculate what focal lengths to use in the front and rear?

I did try to search for an old thread, but didn't get anything useful.

Thanks, Richard
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2003
Messages
87
Location
Portland - O
Format
Large Format
Here is some information I got from the Newsgroup: rec.photo.equipment.large-format. It is from August of 2003.

"The typical formula used for figuring out the combined focal length is 1/f = 1/f1 + 1/f2 - [d/f1 * f2] where f is focal length of combination, f1 and f2 are focal lengths of individual cells and d is the distance between the nodal points of the individual cells." The author of this article is Richard Knoppow.
I do not know how to measure the nodal distance "d" or whether it can simply be ignored.

Alan
 
OP
OP

rrankin

Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
865
Location
La Plata, Mi
Format
Large Format
Thanks. The Wiki article explained the 'd' part, which did turn out to be sort of insignificant but did add about a half inch to the final calculation.
Cheers,
Richard
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom