• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Cachet Panthenic vs. Diafine

Coburg Street

A
Coburg Street

  • 0
  • 1
  • 55
Jesus

A
Jesus

  • 0
  • 1
  • 51

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,737
Messages
2,829,355
Members
100,923
Latest member
GB-A2
Recent bookmarks
0

genecrumpler

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
66
Location
North Caroli
Format
Multi Format
A camera store clerk was telling me the other day that Cachet Panthemic developer was finer grained than Diafine. He flashed a couple of SMALL prints to make the point, but they were too small to make any judgements about the grain. Now as many of you know I love Diafine and am currently using it to process 4x5 sheets of Tmax 100 and Delta 100. However, for 6x6 negatives, diafine is just to grainey to produce good 11x14 prints which have extensive uniform areas (read sky). I currently use Ilfosol-s for 6x6 and 6x7 roll film, which gives the results I like.

Can any one (who has used both) give me some idea if Cachet is noticably better in the grain department? Is it worth trying?

Any drawbacks to cachet that would be worth worrying about?
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
5,082
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
A camera store clerk was telling me the other day that Cachet Panthemic developer was finer grained than Diafine. He flashed a couple of SMALL prints to make the point, but they were too small to make any judgements about the grain. Now as many of you know I love Diafine and am currently using it to process 4x5 sheets of Tmax 100 and Delta 100. However, for 6x6 negatives, diafine is just to grainey to produce good 11x14 prints which have extensive uniform areas (read sky). I currently use Ilfosol-s for 6x6 and 6x7 roll film, which gives the results I like.

Can any one (who has used both) give me some idea if Cachet is noticably better in the grain department? Is it worth trying?

Any drawbacks to cachet that would be worth worrying about?

Cachet developer is divided D-76 while Diafine is a PQ two bath speed increasing developer which will probably give slightly coarser grain.

Hope this helps,

Lachlan
 

CuS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
144
Format
35mm
What ISO and times for Delta 100 in Diafine?

Now as many of you know I love Diafine and am currently using it to process 4x5 sheets of Tmax 100 and Delta 100.

What ISO are you shooting your Delta 100 at and wgta times are you using in diafine? 3+3; 4+3; 3+4 or 4+4?

I just shot a few sheets - overcast sky so I'm looking to punch in a bit more contrast during developing.

Thanks!
 

P C Headland

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
842
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
if you want more contrast/punch, you're going to have to use another developer. Whether you try 3+3 or 3+4 or 4+4, the result will be pretty much the same.

As far as I understand, the only way to really alter the contrast with Diafine as your developer, is to alter your exposure (which is too late for you now...)
 

frotog

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
730
Location
third stone
Format
Large Format
I'd take AB 55 over diafine or the formulary's divided d76 for any roll of b/w. Much better shadow detail, better tones in general plus finer grain. It's also a better deal. Control contrast by varying dilution of solution A. You can also achieve more contrasty results by running the developer at 75+ degrees. This is risky, however, as exchange times between solutions a and b become more critical with warmer developer times.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom