Lots of people put ECN2 film through the C41 process with varying degrees of success. But how would C41 film do if put through ECN2 (skipping the removal step)? I'm getting impatient waiting for enough rolls of exposed Visions3 to justify mixing up the kit, but do have a few rolls of Portra and Ektar laying around. Has anybody tried this before?
My experience says yes, you could develop your C-41 films in ECN-2 chemicals. However, like what happens with Cinestill the density of the negatives will be less, and the colors will differ.
Although Cinestill 800T was originally Vision3 500T, a film designed to be processed with ECN-2 chemicals, this video highlights what you could expect.
That's probably crucial as ECN2 developer by itself and with the recommended ECN2 processing parameters will yield very low gamma/contrast images.
I assume you (or the scanning software) did fairly extensive color corrections on these images. They look nice; I kin dof like the muted palette you got on these. I am concerned if it would translate to RA4 prints, but perhaps that's not relevant for you.
That's probably crucial as ECN2 developer by itself and with the recommended ECN2 processing parameters will yield very low gamma/contrast images.
I assume you (or the scanning software) did fairly extensive color corrections on these images. They look nice; I kin dof like the muted palette you got on these. I am concerned if it would translate to RA4 prints, but perhaps that's not relevant for you.
I dont print color, so these were mostly a fun experiment.
Other than using Silverfasts orange mask removal I did not post much besides a very light crop as I scan with somewhat excessive borders usually.
Unless I take my film to a lab, developing color for me is pretty much always with bleach bypass, I much prefer the look and find it easier on my eyes.