Due to the ready availability of sulfite in the food industry, I doubt if sulfite is a major cost item in developers compared to HQ or other potential ingredients. I believe that this particular developer will have limited shelf life.
FWIW, I did some cost comparisons once, about five years ago. I've still got my spreadsheet with the results. For D-72, the total cost for a liter of stock solution was $1.21. The three most expensive ingredients were hydroquinone ($0.40), metol ($0.30), and sodium sulfite ($0.26). For
Dead Link Removed the total cost for one liter was $0.55, with the five priciest ingredients being ascorbic acid ($0.17), sodium sulfite ($0.07), triethanolamine ($0.07), salicylic acid ($0.07), potassium bromide ($0.07), and sodium sulfite ($0.07). FWIW, Dimezone S, the second developing agent, came in at $0.06. DS-14, BTW, is designed to be used with a replenisher. Used that way, it keeps quite well and is economical.
So for paper developers, the sulfite is among the major costs, but probably not the #1 cost or a high enough cost to produce significant overall savings if eliminated. Sulfite is a bigger component of many film developers, though. For D-76, for instance, sulfite is the #1 cost ($0.58 of $0.95), with the #2 being metol ($0.20).