C-41 washing and stablilizing

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 23
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 11
  • 4
  • 108
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,914
Messages
2,783,017
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
0

Petzi

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
851
Location
Europe
Format
Med. Format Pan
OK, so I assume that a washless C-41 process is inferior to a full wash with water.

I am unsure about the stabilizer. Is it beneficial when the film was properly washed?

In this case, which stabilizer is better for current film, the old Formaldehyde type or the newer stabilizer? Or is it harmful to use the old stabilizer for the new film?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
You should wash any C41 process if you want the best image stability.

The old stabilzer is good for all films with a good wash, the new stabilzer cannot be used with the old films.

PE
 
OP
OP

Petzi

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
851
Location
Europe
Format
Med. Format Pan
The old stabilzer is good for all films with a good wash, the new stabilzer cannot be used with the old films.

Was the old Formalin stabilizer only replaced due to environmental and health concerns?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
The old stabilzer reacted with the magenta coupler and prevented dye degradation. It also acted as a fungicide and bacteriocide. It was replaced due to environmental and health concerns, and the magenta coupler also had to be changed at the same time. The new film does not need the formalin for dye stability.

The new stabilzer is mainly for preservation of the film through its action as a fungicide and anti bacterial action, but there are other reasons. It was developed after I left Kodak so I know little more about it. It is proprietary.

I have been told that it also helps stability with reduced wash processes. I know nothing of this other than that.

PE
 

3Dfan

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
221
Format
35mm RF
Should I then understand that some other brands of film a few years behind Kodak like Ferrania or Konica-Minolta might experience trouble if I drop them off at a photo lab that uses Kodak chemicals?
 
OP
OP

Petzi

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
851
Location
Europe
Format
Med. Format Pan
Should I then understand that some other brands of film a few years behind Kodak like Ferrania or Konica-Minolta might experience trouble if I drop them off at a photo lab that uses Kodak chemicals?

Kodak, Fuji and Agfa have the new formalin-free stabilizer, and perhaps some others. You don't know if your film is treated in it though, because labs might use up old stock of formalin stabilizer. If I read Kodak docs correctly, this is OK.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom