• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Buying my first B&W chemicals. Any advice?

I agree with sticking to liquid developers that have a long shelf life initially (Rodinal, HC-110, etc...). There' always time to change later, but at least for a beginner it's easier to have more consistent results (your developer going bad on you is another variable that you don't have to consider with liquid developers).
 
In another forum was also a discussion about longevity of developers, and generally people are indeed using Rodinal or HC-110. An alternative is Caffenol which can be made 'just in time' and directly used, so that would eliminate the storage problem. Depending on the ingredients this can also be a true ecological developer.
 
I started with Kodak D-76. Ilford's ID-11 is basically the same thing ( I noticed that on Amazon Espana's website that D-76 is much cheaper ). This is a great general purpose developer and works well with fast and slow films. I usually used a 1+1 dilution which made temperature control easy. A liter of D-76/ID-11 diluted 1+1 will develop 8 35mm film in a metal tank (250ml/film) or 6 films in a plastic tank (300ml/film).

Currently, I use HC-110 for most films, and keep a bottle of Rodinal available for the few films where HC-110 isn't recommended. I have stayed with the concentrated liquids because I develop film intermittently. At times, I may go a month or two between developing sessions, and I know the liquids will still work.
 
I'm also just getting started in film/darkroom processing (my quarantine hobby!) so was considering this exact question very recently and did lots of research into various options. Ended up going with Rodinal as my developer and TF-4 as fixer, because I liked the idea of minimizing the number of chemicals needed to start out, and sticking with liquids and a one-shot developer made the most sense while I'm still learning the basics.

The points made about minimizing variables are very well-taken. It took 3 or 4 rolls just to learn to get the film loaded onto a reel without destroying it! Now I'm in the "will I get a single frame on this roll that isn't horribly over- or under-exposed?" phase.

I have plans to move onto making Caffenol and eventually mixing D-76, D-23 and fixer from constituent chemicals, but only once I'm able to get consistent and predictable results. For this part of the learning curve, I'm liking the Rodinal+TF-4 combo a lot.
 
Yes
Maybe you are absolutely right, sir / glass
- I confess that I was wrong and apologize to everyone.
God bless you
 
Hello!

I'm about to buy my first chemicals to develop B&W film at home and I would like some advise.

Btw, anyone have tried the MACO eco kit? Is any good (and really eco)?


Thanks!
This may help.
 

Attachments

  • PhotoChemBook.pdf
    180.8 KB · Views: 136
Mohmad, you're very kind to everyone. No need to apologize!
 

Good luck. It's a fun rabbit hole.
 
Indeed, or you can buy a can of "lighter gas" (butane) for €2 and spray a bit in the bottle after you opened it/poored some developer out. Since butane is heavier than air, no air will be in contact with the developer. Butane itself doesn't react with the developer. In this way I managed to keep a bottle of Ilfosol 3 good for at least 6 months (then it was finished).

Well, I don't see way HC110 (although I am not a big fan of the results) or Rodinal aren't as good to start with. Grain for Rodinal might be a disadvantage if you shoot high iso film on 135 film, but we don't know ;-) Mixing might be easier with ID11 though and probably better for the consistency of the results. When you need 125mL of ID11 stock, 3 or 4mL don't matter as much when using HC110 in 1+63 or Rodinal in 1+50.
 
. If working with medium speed films (e.g Delta 100 or FP4 Plus) Ilfosol-3 should be fine.
I pushed HP5+ to 800 without problems in Ilfosol 3.
Actually I find the 1+9 times for Delta 100 and FP4+ too short, although this looks like the dilution Ilford recommands.
 
Rodinal one shot with massive dev chart as reference is really easy.
 
Rodinal one shot with massive dev chart as reference is really easy.
Yeah, but might not always be the best choice. For example if you shoot Tri-X/HP5+ in 135.
If you shoot 120 this is less a concern
 
Yeah, but might not always be the best choice. For example if you shoot Tri-X/HP5+ in 135.
If you shoot 120 this is less a concern

I haven't had any issues with HP5 or delta 400 with either 35mm or 120 using Rodinal 1+50. The consistency is always the same too. I always make sure to check the ambient temperature and use massive dev chart to compensate for times. I stopped agitating using the twist on paterson tank. My film seems sharper if I roll and twirl regularly. I have enough rolls of self development to see the clear difference now.
 


Would the use of butane make flaming good prints, making the high lights brilliant?