YesNo, no, no.
Starting out keep it simple: one film, one developer, one stop bath with indicator, one fixer [formally called hypo], and one surfactant [PhotoFlo to eliminate streaking on the negatives. Learn those well and then later try different films or developers. This is not a time to play junior chemist, this is the time to learn the basics well so that you have a stong foundation.
This may help.Hello!
I'm about to buy my first chemicals to develop B&W film at home and I would like some advise.
Btw, anyone have tried the MACO eco kit? Is any good (and really eco)?
Thanks!
I'm also just getting started in film/darkroom processing (my quarantine hobby!) so was considering this exact question very recently and did lots of research into various options. Ended up going with Rodinal as my developer and TF-4 as fixer, because I liked the idea of minimizing the number of chemicals needed to start out, and sticking with liquids and a one-shot developer made the most sense while I'm still learning the basics.
The points made about minimizing variables are very well-taken. It took 3 or 4 rolls just to learn to get the film loaded onto a reel without destroying it! Now I'm in the "will I get a single frame on this roll that isn't horribly over- or under-exposed?" phase.
I have plans to move onto making Caffenol and eventually mixing D-76, D-23 and fixer from constituent chemicals, but only once I'm able to get consistent and predictable results. For this part of the learning curve, I'm liking the Rodinal+TF-4 combo a lot.
Indeed, or you can buy a can of "lighter gas" (butane) for €2 and spray a bit in the bottle after you opened it/poored some developer out. Since butane is heavier than air, no air will be in contact with the developer. Butane itself doesn't react with the developer. In this way I managed to keep a bottle of Ilfosol 3 good for at least 6 months (then it was finished)."
I started is developing B&W film in 1958. I'll second this advice from a prior reply. If you buy a gallon of stock developer, consider breaking it down for storage in 250 or 500ml bottles, which will let it last longer than if all stored in one big bottle.
Well, I don't see way HC110 (although I am not a big fan of the results) or Rodinal aren't as good to start with. Grain for Rodinal might be a disadvantage if you shoot high iso film on 135 film, but we don't know ;-) Mixing might be easier with ID11 though and probably better for the consistency of the results. When you need 125mL of ID11 stock, 3 or 4mL don't matter as much when using HC110 in 1+63 or Rodinal in 1+50.You'll get a lot of fanboys clammering for HC-110, Rodinal, or who knows what. Skip that stuff until you have some experience and get positive results. That means one film, one developer, and one processing technique until you have worked out reliable and repeatable results.
I pushed HP5+ to 800 without problems in Ilfosol 3.. If working with medium speed films (e.g Delta 100 or FP4 Plus) Ilfosol-3 should be fine.
Yeah, but might not always be the best choice. For example if you shoot Tri-X/HP5+ in 135.Rodinal one shot with massive dev chart as reference is really easy.
Yeah, but might not always be the best choice. For example if you shoot Tri-X/HP5+ in 135.
If you shoot 120 this is less a concern
Indeed, or you can buy a can of "lighter gas" (butane) for €2 and spray a bit in the bottle after you opened it/poored some developer out. Since butane is heavier than air, no air will be in contact with the developer. Butane itself doesn't react with the developer. In this way I managed to keep a bottle of Ilfosol 3 good for at least 6 months (then it was finished).
Well, I don't see way HC110 (although I am not a big fan of the results) or Rodinal aren't as good to start with. Grain for Rodinal might be a disadvantage if you shoot high iso film on 135 film, but we don't know ;-) Mixing might be easier with ID11 though and probably better for the consistency of the results. When you need 125mL of ID11 stock, 3 or 4mL don't matter as much when using HC110 in 1+63 or Rodinal in 1+50.
Would the use of butane make flaming good prints, making the high lights brilliant?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?