No other 28-70mm Vario Elmar R lovers here?
Nobody?
Well, I have the "original" version - the Sigma UC 3.5-4.5/28-70mm. As already correctly explained in this thread, the optical design of this lens and the Leica variant are identical.
But the Leica has different and much better mechanics and built quality, and was produced with better QC and tighter tolerances.
I bought this lens as a young student when I started my studies at university. I bought it mainly as a lens for travels. The reasons for my purchase = the advantages of the lens:
+ very good sharpness
+ high contrast
+ very compact
+ very useful zoom range for my purposes (mainly travel, shooting landscapes and cityscapes, and my girlfriend at that time)
+ low price (about 230 DM)
+ excellent price performance ratio.
The disadvantages of this Sigma lens:
- strong barrel distortion at the wide end
- the colour transmission of the lens is not optimal, there is a visible yellowish-greenish colour cast
- now after the decades the "ZEN" surface finish Sigma used at that time has become very ugly and sticky
- the mechanics (focus and zoom ring) is not operating smooth anymore (it is bucking / stuttering); a general problem with budget-optimised lenses in the past and today: To keep the price down compromises have to be made, and that is almost always done in this area (mechanics, built quality), because the disadvantages mostly occur later, over the years.
I hope this info is a bit helpful for you.
Best regards,
Henning