Yes it would. Many mopic film stocks for printing were ISO 3 or 6, try something in that range for exposure.I don’t think so. The leader of film exposed to light is black when processed. Would a print film react this way?
I have no idea of the ISO of a slow movie film but even if it is say a stop or two stops slower then I would expect there to be something there. Any opinions of my statement?Thank you, I exposed a roll at ISO 50 and film looked unexposed. No images. Probably a very slow movie film?
So the developer produced normal edge markings but no images at all?Yes there are edge markings Eastman safety film the number 25 and two square markings which show the film might have been made in 1940,1960,or 1980?also something that looks like this .II:
That is a slit marking: http://www.film-tech.com/ubb/f1/t011524.htmlYes there are edge markings Eastman safety film the number 25 and two square markings which show the film might have been made in 1940,1960,or 1980?also something that looks like this .II:
Agree. Probably film for contact printing distribution (postive) copies. Usually blue sensitive or at best orthochromatic at single digit iso.Yes it would. Many mopic film stocks for printing were ISO 3 or 6, try something in that range for exposure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?