Bulk film loaders and old film??

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 1
  • 0
  • 18
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 28
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 33
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 176

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,233
Members
99,712
Latest member
asalazarphoto
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
333
Location
NE Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
In the big lot of darkroom gear I picked up a couple weeks ago was included a couple of Watson 100 bulk film loaders and reusable cartridges.
Not sure if it's worth messing with for me or not yet.
Operation of thing looks pretty straightforward and I found the instructions on the Butkus site so all good there.
Just curious about what the benefit of these things are other than cost? Hey, a couple of bucks a roll is a couple of bucks to spend on something else.

The unit loaded with what I think is B&W film only had the somewhat cryptic label of "ORTHO" hand written on a piece of tape. Not sure of the age but likely as much as 20 years in non-temperature controlled storage.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
You can snip off a bit of unexposed film and develop it in whatever developer is handy to perhaps identify it by its edge marking. Don't expect much. When I was shoot lots of film a few decades ago, reloading bulk film was worth while. As I recall, the Watson may have a felt light trap that must be kept clean or film may get scratched.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,918
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The biggest advantage from my point of view is the ability to choose exactly how many shots to load on each roll.

Followed by the fact that each bulk load roll is very compact - takes very little space in the freezer or on the shelf.

Even in a bulk loader, they are compact.
 

darkroommike

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
1,723
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Is the emulsion side pink and purple from the base side? If so your "ortho" is most likely Kodalith Ortho, Type 3.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Watson's use the film loading cover as a light trap Gotta be opened or else :surprised: Nice scratches.
 

philipus

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
210
Format
Medium Format
I use an Alden to bulk load Eastman Double-X which is considerably cheaper than for instance Tri-X and in my view a better film too. And, at least here in Europe, bulk rolls of various Ilford and Rollei films are often cheaper 36-roll for (approx.) 36-roll. So, yes, it pays of. And it's not a big hassle, I find, to bulk load either. In the beginning I tended to load up a 20 rolls at a time to have them around but these days I just load a few whenever I need. All this to say that I find bulk loaders worth it.
 

RichardJack

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
331
Location
Long Island, NY
Format
Multi Format
Hi,
I own Watson and Lloyd loaders and I like the simple Lloyd better. It is easy to forget with the Watson and scratch your film. The price of bulk film has tripled in the last 10 years, but I still prefer the option of controlling the number of exposures on my rolls.
Like many things in photography it's a matter of personal preference.
Rick
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,563
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I have three bulk loaders, all bought used. I have a Watson 100, a Prinz 66 (copy of Watson 100) and a "The Daylight" which is similar to the Lloyd loader. They all work well, and I tend to keep one with a nice 100ISO film (currently Fomapan 100), one with a fast film (Currently Ilford HP5+) and the third with 'something else' (currently Kentmere 400).

Advantages? Well here in the UK I can cut the cost of each film in half. I can also decide to load a full 36 (or more) exposures or make a cassette with just 10. Total flexibility on how many exposures are in the 135 cassette. Due to the decreased cost, it allows me to shoot a LOT more film.

The Lloyd type bulk loaders are easier to use, but I find nothing wrong with the Watsons. I've never forgotten to twist the light trap open. To be honest, both designs work fine, and can sometimes be had for peanuts if you are prepared to bide your time on the online auctions.
 

ac12

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
720
Location
SF Bay Area (SFO), USA
Format
Multi Format
I've used the Watson for years, and never forgot to rotate the drum to open the light trap.
Just make it part of your loading procedure/check list, along with zeroing the frame counter.

The only negative I have with the Watson is the last frame will be lost, because of the longer distance between the trap and the cartridge. This is because the film has to go over the sprockets for the frame counter mechanism.
The Lloyd has the cartridge right next to the felt trap so the last frame isn't lost. You just have to count turns of the handle and match up against a chart of x turns = y frames.

I used the Watson 100, my brother used the Lloyds.
 

Harry Stevens

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
424
Location
East Midland
Format
Multi Format
I join my film canister in my Watson's near to the entrance and then it goes in the changing bag for completion so no last frame loss.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom