Building a primitive LF Camera

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 4
  • 0
  • 53
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 2
  • 2
  • 54
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 51
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 7
  • 5
  • 204

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,819
Messages
2,781,324
Members
99,716
Latest member
Thomas_2104
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
I have ordered a box of P/N 55 from eBay and am going to build a large format camera. Very few movements if any. I'm thinking one box that will slip inside of another (five sided cubes). The smaller up front that will hold the lens. The outer to the back that will hold a ?

O.K. Where do I start? I'm thinking lens so I know focal length hence how long the camera needs to be. Then, Graflex back? Ground Glass and Polaroid holder? Build the boxes around these. Anyone done anything like this? Any ideas? Anyone have a near junk LF lens that they would be willing to donate to the project?

Lemme know what you all think. I'm in no hurry on this one. This will be a little by little labor of love, and probably hate as well. You know how it is. Any other design ideas welcome as well.
 

Mark Fisher

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
1,691
Location
Chicago
Format
Medium Format
Check out Alan Greene's book Primitive Photography. Just for fun, I wanted to make the lightest 8x10 camera possible and I did it out of gator board (like foamcore, but with plastic cover sheets) that would have ground glass viewing, uses standard holders and a home made lens. If you are curious, I have pictures of it at http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotofish/ It sounds close to what you are talking about.

Mark
 

jmcclure

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
16
Location
Seaford, DE
Format
Multi Format
Here is a paper on buildig a replica chamfered box camera. It may give you
some good ideas.

Dead Link Removed
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
for a sliding boxer, the rear sliding into the front is inherently better for light leaks because the leak would have to enter, and reflect into the rear portion to reach the film holder.

This doesn't cure all potential leaks, but it's better than front sliding into rear where a loose fit will beam light straight back to the filmholder.

Graphlok is most desirable (expensive) back, Spring Back I think is possibly most flexible regarding types of filmholders that fit. Ask around here or graflex.org to make sure you don't end up with the awkward combo that requires grooved filmholders, unless you have the matching stuff.

Junk lens? You could easily MAKE a junk lens. An unwanted slightly better than junk lens? I'll look.

A Kodak 1A or 2A with rotten bellows probably has a 120-130 mm Rapid Rectilinear symmetrical lens and 2 (read 1) speed shutter with B & T & adjustable iris. Might cover a good portion of 4x5. Unscrew one cell (preferably front) and you have a meniscus achromat of slightly more than 2x the original f.l. and a large enough image circle that you have the advantage of only using the central portion, stop down to correct the lens further & you can use B and long exposures. IF you have excess image circle, do a good job of baffling the interior to prevent internal body reflections. Flat surface w/black paint may not be enough.

Gatorfoam actually has a wood fiber facing, per the mfr. Per a competitor, it also has formaldehyde in it, so don't inhale dust from sawing or sanding it.

I made two lenses from reading glasses. Haven't tried them yet, but Sam Wang, a respected and accomplished photographer & photography prof. in S.C., with much better credentials than I , suggested this to me.

I'll take a photo & post them. Remind me if you get impatient.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
for a sliding boxer, the rear sliding into the front is inherently better for light leaks because the leak would have to enter, and reflect into the rear portion to reach the film holder.

This doesn't cure all potential leaks, but it's better than front sliding into rear where a loose fit will beam light straight back to the filmholder.

Graphlok is most desirable (expensive) back, Spring Back I think is possibly most flexible regarding types of filmholders that fit. Ask around here or graflex.org to make sure you don't end up with the awkward combo that requires grooved filmholders, unless you have the matching stuff.

Junk lens? You could easily MAKE a junk lens. An unwanted slightly better than junk lens? I'll look.

A Kodak 1A or 2A with rotten bellows probably has a 120-130 mm Rapid Rectilinear symmetrical lens and 2 (read 1) speed shutter with B & T & adjustable iris. Might cover a good portion of 4x5. Unscrew one cell (preferably front) and you have a meniscus achromat of slightly more than 2x the original f.l. and a large enough image circle that you have the advantage of only using the central portion, stop down to correct the lens further & you can use B and long exposures. IF you have excess image circle, do a good job of baffling the interior to prevent internal body reflections. Flat surface w/black paint may not be enough.

Gatorfoam actually has a wood fiber facing, per the mfr. Per a competitor, it also has formaldehyde in it, so don't inhale dust from sawing or sanding it.

I made two lenses from reading glasses. Haven't tried them yet, but Sam Wang, a respected and accomplished photographer & photography prof. in S.C., with much better credentials than I , suggested this to me.

I'll take a photo & post them. Remind me if you get impatient.

Hey, go visit this thread. Get junky.

http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php?t=35097
 
OP
OP
Christopher Walrath
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
Magnifying glasses. I like it. I'm gonna try this out. Keep 'em coming folks. Give me ideas.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
Considering the cost of 55, maybe a single non-achromat element (magnifying glass) might not be a good approach.

At least you get to shoot one sheet at a time & decide whether to use that lens for the crossword puzzle or leave it on-camera.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
Dead Link Removed

This is a Kodak 1A loaded with 70mm film. Not a hack job, but shows you what the lens can do. Rapid Rectilinear, 120-130 mm I guess
 

Joe VanCleave

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
677
Location
Albuquerque,
Format
Pinhole
George Eastman Online Museum

For a great resource of ideas on how to build nested/sliding box cameras, visit the George Eastman Online Museum. Here is an example of some cameras. The entire technology section of the online museum is here.

Here's an example of a sliding (nested) box camera that may give you some construction ideas.

~Joe
 

freygr

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
137
Location
Portland Ore
Format
Multi Format
For a fast lens check out schools for broken overhead lenses. I have a few with the plastic housings which can't be used due to melted and broker plastic housings and they are fast triplets, color corrected, and fills my 11 x14 ground glass test jig. The one's I have are 14 in (327 mm on the housing) there is not any place for stops though. You may be able to find doublets and singlet lenses also most are 14" but some are 12". But some of the older bigger WWII and 1950 vintage overhead had some real nice lenses. Most of the cheap Overheads have the doublets and singlet lenses.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom