Bugs found on negatives, living in camera.

thomsonrc

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
98
Location
Edinburgh
Format
35mm
I noticed on a few prints that there were some bugs, checked the negatives and they were on them too. I presume these insects are living in one or more of my cameras, but I cant understand why they are in focus. Surely they should be well out of focus? Any ideas how to get rid of them?

Cheers

Ritchie
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Sounds like you have camera lice.

When they are small enough and crawling on the film plane, they would be in focus, or very nearly so. Put the camera in a plastic bag and put it in a freezer overnight. Bring it back up to room temp before you take it out of the bag, and then blow out the camera body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PhotoJim

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2005
Messages
2,314
Location
Regina, SK, CA
Format
35mm
The digital shooters have to worry about bugs. Apparently now we have to too.

I had a shutter in a Fed 3a that was stuck. I found out that an insect got stuck inside it (a decent-sized one - no idea how it got there) and had caused the curtains to stick together. Ugh.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,051
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
I wonder how Brady and his bunch photographed with wet plates during the Civil War...seeing how there were thousands of horses and mules and probably a thousand flies for each one of them!

Vaughn
 

ricksplace

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
1,561
Location
Thunder Bay,
Format
Multi Format
If freezing doesn't do it, try the old trapper's trick. Put the camera in a garbage bag, give the bag a good shot of Raid and tie it shut. Give it about an hour, open the bag, and whatever was alive when you tied it shut is dead. Trappers do this to kill the lice before skinning.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,119
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
I had a spider living in the bellows of my enlarger for a while. It really confounded me because he would move in and out of the picture. It took me a while to figure out where he was.
 

kombizz

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
64
Location
USA
Format
35mm
I am sure if you put your infect equipment under not too hot sun, th bug would escape
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
Vaughn said:
I wonder how Brady and his bunch photographed with wet plates during the Civil War...seeing how there were thousands of horses and mules and probably a thousand flies for each one of them!

Vaughn
Click to expand...

That's easy- between the ether and the alcohol, any bugs getting near the collodion would get asphyxiated/intoxicated/poisoned by the fumes.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,051
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
TheFlyingCamera said:
That's easy- between the ether and the alcohol, any bugs getting near the collodion would get asphyxiated/intoxicated/poisoned by the fumes.
Click to expand...

I did not think of that! Which means the photographers ran the danger of dropping like flies, too...

But since the plates were still a bit sticky (I assume) when used, one would have to chase the flies out of the camera before loading it. Must have been "fun"! But I don't remember seeing any Civil way images with the sillioette of flies on them!

Vaughn
 

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O

No, that was when they used gaseous mercury to develop their plates. . .
 

RobertP

Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
1,190
Format
ULarge Format
By the time Brady, Gardner and the Brady Corps were shooting their war images they were using wet-plate collodion. Mercury was used in processing Dags, which Brady did use earlier in his career. Their biggest danger was mistaking their potassium cyanide glass for their whiskey glass or accidently allowing their developer (acetic acid) and potassium cyanide to come in contact with each other. This would produce a nice little toxic cloud inside of their Whatsit Wagons that would kill any bug and the photographer too. I heard a story not long ago about the title "The Mad hatter" apparently mercury was used in the production of felt hats. The workers would eventually go mad from the mercury fumes over time, thus the term. I guess this was before we had OSHA.
 

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that photographers were dropping like flies when they were using mercury, not that they were using mercury in the Civil War.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
FilmIs4Ever said:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that photographers were dropping like flies when they were using mercury, not that they were using mercury in the Civil War.
Click to expand...

I'm confused, when where the flies using mercury?
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,051
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
JBrunner said:
I'm confused, when where the flies using mercury?
Click to expand...

They still do -- that's why they always rise up and get in your face as the day warms up.

Photographing around my in-law's dairy farm in Australia, I'd start before sun-up and finish not too long after it rose before the flies got too bad...then I'd go over to the dairy and help finish milking the cows. But I guess better in my face than in my camera!

Vaughn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…