Alas, methinks the Interwebz are becoming too much of
A Good Thing(tm)! These various groups proliferate -- sometimes maybe because it's hard to tell what's already there, and there become multiple groups overlapping each other and diluting traffic that is pretty small to begin with. On Flickr, there is also a
discussion group for Bronica. I look at that from time to time and it claims to have over 4000 members, but traffic is near non-existent. (And thanks, I didn't know about the group you posted above!)
When I first cobbled together my SQ-A kit circa 2006, I had a problem and put Google to work. That's when I discovered APUG, as well as Photo.net. In general I got the most useful info here (and a number of people are seen on both). ((Especially at the time, the navigation of the other site was way more tedious, among other turn-offs.)) I think posting on the Medium Format forum here, and including some key like "Bronica SQ" in the title (as you have wisely done) is about the best you/we can do. It has always seemed a little mysterious to me as to what the "Groups" here are supposed to be. They are almost like leftovers of a previous site merged into this one. Granted, they allow an individual to start up a separate sub-forum and exert some control over it -- so you could even start a Bronica SQ-x group
, but I find traffic on most of those groups, at least the handful I've joined, is really minimal. I suspect their largest utility would be to create and coordinate activities for geographic regions, and some of that is indeed done. (
Pennsy Photo Pholks anyone? ... )
I think those older Bronicas, besides having focal plane shutters, represent a sort of classic, collector target; a more "artistic" styling that the newer more industrial business-like SQ, ETR and GS didn't have when the groups were being created -- the latter were almost still in production!