I'm curious to know too--I had this question to my self a while ago. I've come close to buying the GS one (for my GS-1)--I have the 90 degree prims that makes that work well, but I've never pulled the trigger.
I'm curious to know too--I had this question to my self a while ago. I've come close to buying the GS one (for my GS-1)--I have the 90 degree prims that makes that work well, but I've never pulled the trigger.
Just to be clear, there is only one revolving adapter, and that was made specifically for GS1, but there is a plate that mounts on top to accept ETR (and I assume SQ, but that I have not read about, do not own SQ)
The only plate I have found is the one shown in second photo in my original post (and so far nothing in any Bronica literature is showing it, nor discussing it).The Bronica Revolving Tripod Adapter, along with the Rotarty Viewfinder, was supposed to work together to mimic the Mamiya RB/RZ 67's rotating back when on a tripod, in a studio. That is, the lens axis stays the same when the revolving adapter is used, and the rotating viewfinder allowed waist level viewing - just like those Mamiya's.
The plate for the ETRS is needed to raise the smaller camera body so the lens stays on the same axis when rotated.
<snip> ...It does not seem thick enough to do what you are implying it does. ... <snip>
ETRS has a film gate height or 42mm, while the GS1 has a film gate of 54mm. Assuming all things equal, you would need a 6mm thick plate to put the optical axis at the same height. Probably less, as the ETRS is smaller, and has less space for the mechanics under the mirror box (so it's porbably a little thicker there).
I do not have the rotating viewfinder, but the other prism finders are quite bright, so I don't see why it would be dim in the rotating viewfinder. I don't have an ERTS to compare to either.
I don't have the Bronica rotating adapter , but I do have a Mamiya 645 rotating tripod adapter .
It works well with the Bronica after a minor alteration .
There is a screw head that sticks out and when the Bronica is turned to portrait orientation seems to touch the camera body .
It might not matter , but I altered mine to a countersunk headed screw rather than the panhead as supplied as I wanted a bit of clearance rather than run the risk of it doing damage .
I've never seen a Bronica one though .
View attachment 335841View attachment 335842
On the Mamiya Revolviong Tripod adatper, the screw head is suppose to be surrounded by a rubber bumper, and the camera body rests on it when rotated. The bumper can be adjusted or shimmed so that the camera's rotation is perfectly perpendicular. The Bronica revolving adapter is set by stops in the linkages to be perfectly perpendicular after rotation.
I was looking into Mamiya option and expected some mod was needed to make it fit. I like how Bronica designed its own though, even if I believe it is substantially heavier option, but also made to fit.
My problem is.. even with a solution like that to ratate the ETRSi, how could I attach the cable release in vertical?!? That side of the camera would be almost completely blocked!
My problem is.. even with a solution like that to ratate the ETRSi, how could I attach the cable release in vertical?!? That side of the camera would be almost completely blocked!
The optical axis is midway in the film gate, that is the main vertical difference in the dimensions of the 2 cameras. Plus the ETRS run the film vertically, so it needs a little more space for the film rollers. Mechanical space below the film gate is otherwise similar as they use a similar mechanism.<snip> ...The heights you mention I see no relevance. It is where optical axis above base of each that counts that must match. ...
There is a notch at the back of the side support on the Bronica revolving tripod adapter - is that for the cable release? I'm assuming it matches the GS1 cable release.My problem is.. even with a solution like that to rotate the ETRSi, how could I attach the cable release in vertical?!? That side of the camera would be almost completely blocked!
It is midway, but it were one midway vs. the other is n relation to mounting base. I don't know either figure. They look close form I can see inThe optical axis is midway in the film gate, that is the main vertical difference in the dimensions of the 2 cameras. Plus the ETRS run the film vertically, so it needs a little more space for the film rollers. Mechanical space below the film gate is otherwise similar as they use a similar mechanism.
In addition, the published vertical dimension of the ETRS is 87mm. The GS1 body is 99mm.
There is a notch at the back of the side support on the Bronica revolving tripod adapter - is that for the cable release? I'm assuming it matches the GS1 cable release.
Bronica actually lists same style revolver for the GS1 in one of the brochures, but it appears they had opted to go with only what is listed here, as this style I cannot locate anywhere.FWIW, that Mamiya revolving adapter is the one designed for the original line of Mamiya 645 cameras - the 645, 645J, 645 1000s - and not the more recent Super, Pro or Pro TL.
It works with my AE finder equipped 645 Pro, even if the mounting orientation is counter-intuitive.
The version designed for those later cameras is vastly larger and looks like this:
View attachment 335913
IIRC, I used the small very flexible cable release off my Rolleicord TLR , screwed on after you flip the camera over .
I think the usual large type cable releases long metal end foul on the tightening rod in the middle when trying to attach it .
Whereas the small cloth covered one with only the tip being metal is much more manoeuvrable , if a bit fiddly.
If you intend flipping the camera over you need to remove the cable release and reattach each time .
Mines the Mamiya one though not the Bronica .
It looks like you might have the same issue .
So it is possible!! Could you please show a photo of that? Anyway you have an ETRS not an ETRSi, I don't know if cable hole has a slightly different position on the camera body.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?