Thanks for your reply. If only spot metering mode, I may give this camera system a miss. Spot metering's fine for something like portraits, but not so good for landscapes. And you seem to agree, that using the non rotary prism finder with the camera in vertical mode should be fine.From the looks of it the AE prism has only a single metering pattern. Check out page 20 which has a diagram of the metering pattern:
http://www.cameramanuals.org/bronica/bronica_gs-1_ae_prism_g.pdf
I don’t know if there were over versions of the AE finder. I don’t have a GS-1, but the ETRSi. That model had three different AE prisms, and at least the last one had a spot mode, but I don’t see that in he manual for the GS-1 prism.
I don’t know why you wouldn’t use the AE prism in portrait mode, it should work fine. What it challenging is trying the use the waist level finder in portrait mode. The WLF shows the image reversed left to right, which makes portrait very hard, but any of the prism finders will show the image upright and correct left to right, so should work fine—like any 35mm SLR—in portrait.
Ah, so a bit of a compromise between spot and evaluative/matrix then.I think its more of a center weighted averaging meter. I have the AEIII for my ETRSi, and I prefer to just use a handheld light meter, though in body can be awful convenient at times. I've considered adding a GS1 to my collection, but for now I like the small size of the ETRSi.
Your other 6x7 SLR options are the RB67/RZ67, the Pentax 6x7/67/67II, and maybe some others I don't know. I'm not very familiar with the Mamiya, but the Pentax 67II has 6 segment matrix metering in its AE finder.
whichThe AF finder has center metering, not a spot. As I know the rotary finder has both center and spot metering. The AF finder meter had interesting covering, you will find that it has two senzors that combine their mesurements. Both finders are modern for their time and I find the AF finder very good.
Regarding the rotary finder, there are discussions here on Photrio, which is better the GS-1 or Mamiya RB/RZ. Main advantage of Mamiya is in their rotary backs that makes portrait shooting very convenient. Now here the rotary prism on GS-1 somehow substitutes the disadvantage of not having the rotary back. So you can find sayings that you cannot shoot portrait with GS-1 without a rotary finder, this comes from people who use their RB/RZ in studio on tripod with waist level finder for portraiture. They do not need to bend and crouch their body behind the camera to look through a prism camera when the model is sitting and a camera is low and the back is in vertical orientation. They can look to a (waist level) finder from above. With GS-1, you can mimmick the same with the rotary finder. Thats all.
It's ok, for general use centreweighted is more useful than spot, but it seems strange that what was probably a professional camera when launched doesn't have all 3 metering options.The AE finder G was only made with a center weighted meter. You can shoot portrait or landscape like any eye level finder, but it helps to have the speed grip.
If you want a spot meter, you have to use the Rotary Prism Finder, which has both center weighted and spot. The Rotary finder is a waist level finder, and in conjunction with the Revolving Tripod Adapter G, allows you to simulate a rotating back from a tripod - switching from portrait to landscape without changing the camera position, and maintain a waist level finder.
The GS1 was introduced in 1982 with an AE meter.It's ok, for general use centreweighted is more useful than spot, but it seems strange that what was probably a professional camera when launched doesn't have all 3 metering options.
It's fine, ref. being awkward to hand hold in portrait orientation, I always use a tripod for shoots.I used the GS-1 with the normal (unmetered) prism for some time- I would say that although it is possible to use the camera in portrait orientation with the prism finder, it is extremely awkward to hold the body in this orientation. I would suggest that the grip is essential if that's something you think you'd commonly do. The Pentax 67 is far easier to use in this regard, and it's what I switched to from the GS-1. That said, the Pentax 90mm/2.8 has nothing on the Bronica 100mm/3.5, which I found to be a far sharper lens. If I was to use it again, I'd probably go for the WLF to make it slightly lighter.
Oh, I never realized this, I just assumed matrix/overall/evaluative etc. was the default metering mode of all cameras that had meters, and that spot and centre weighted were later additions. Makes sense now then, why the Bronica doesn't have it.The GS1 was introduced in 1982 with an AE meter.
The 1st Matrix Meter appeared in 1983 with the Nikon FA (then call the AMP - Automatic Multi-Pattern meter), which was "good", but not great.
Back then Professionals generally preferred to use the AE lock, and/or spot meter to get the exposure. Or a hand held meter if time permitted, as that was more accurate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?