bright viewfinder is not necessarily best

Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 2
  • 2
  • 48
Spin-in-in-in

D
Spin-in-in-in

  • 0
  • 0
  • 32
Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 13
  • 8
  • 227
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 154

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,860
Messages
2,782,073
Members
99,733
Latest member
dlevans59
Recent bookmarks
0

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Some years ago I put a bosscreen on my technikardan. It made a big difference to the viewfinder brightness but I've always found it difficult to focus exactly.
I just put back the original Linhof ground glass and using a 45 reflex viewer in dim light just after sunset, I was able to focus really accurately even though it is far less bright than the bosscreen.
The crop is from a notice board to the left of the arched church door and is at 100% of scan resolutoin which was done at 3200dpi unsharpened. On the neg with a 6x loupe, I can read most of what is on that notice board so I'm really pleased I put the old GG back. It just seems to snap into focus unlike the bosscreen.
View attachment 10227 View attachment 10226
 
Last edited by a moderator:

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
why was the boss screen harder to focus? was it just not sharp or was there a 'hot spot'
 
OP
OP

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
It's because the granularity in the linhof gg is either in focus or not. There seems to be a point with the linhof glass that it just pops into focus which is obvious. With the bosscreen a little either side of focus is difficult to detect, especially in dim light. I seemed to get more images slightly off focus with the bosscreen. It could just be me but I'm pleased with going back to the linhof gg. I should have done it long ago.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,546
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I have had this same experience with a Intenscreen. The brighter a screen is made, the closer it gets to an 'impossible-to-focus' aerial image.

I remember using a Beaulieu movie camera in which the focusing screen could flip out of the way, so you could have the best of both worlds :smile:
 
Joined
May 29, 2007
Messages
226
Location
Tucson Az
Format
Multi Format
I think that has something to do with the use of a Fresnel; It creates a distinct spiral pattern that is almost impossible to get a sharp focus through. I can see how that would definitely be a problem if you are making enlargements.

yours;
 

Steve Hamley

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
452
Location
Knoxville, T
Format
Multi Format
Same experience with a Maxwell versus Ebony. I like the Ebony better because it "snaps" into focus. Granted the Maxwell is about 1/2 to a stop brighter, but it does not "snap" into focus. I think a lot of people want a "TV screen" with no granularity, but don't realize the effect granularity has on determining accurate focus.

That said, a Maxwell for a wide angle may likely be a good thing.

Cheers,

Steve
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom