Some years ago I put a bosscreen on my technikardan. It made a big difference to the viewfinder brightness but I've always found it difficult to focus exactly.
I just put back the original Linhof ground glass and using a 45 reflex viewer in dim light just after sunset, I was able to focus really accurately even though it is far less bright than the bosscreen.
The crop is from a notice board to the left of the arched church door and is at 100% of scan resolutoin which was done at 3200dpi unsharpened. On the neg with a 6x loupe, I can read most of what is on that notice board so I'm really pleased I put the old GG back. It just seems to snap into focus unlike the bosscreen. View attachment 10227View attachment 10226
It's because the granularity in the linhof gg is either in focus or not. There seems to be a point with the linhof glass that it just pops into focus which is obvious. With the bosscreen a little either side of focus is difficult to detect, especially in dim light. I seemed to get more images slightly off focus with the bosscreen. It could just be me but I'm pleased with going back to the linhof gg. I should have done it long ago.
I had a similar experience w an Beattie Intenscreen and then a regular satin snow gg. There was probably a 2 stop difference, but the satin snow was much sharper.
I think that has something to do with the use of a Fresnel; It creates a distinct spiral pattern that is almost impossible to get a sharp focus through. I can see how that would definitely be a problem if you are making enlargements.
Same experience with a Maxwell versus Ebony. I like the Ebony better because it "snaps" into focus. Granted the Maxwell is about 1/2 to a stop brighter, but it does not "snap" into focus. I think a lot of people want a "TV screen" with no granularity, but don't realize the effect granularity has on determining accurate focus.
That said, a Maxwell for a wide angle may likely be a good thing.