I tried black borders and found they don’t work for me, but of course tastes vary. I trim off the white borders and dry mount to a backer sheet of mat board. The window mat window is larger by about 1cm top, left and right and 1.5cm for the bottom to leave room for a signature.
+1What ever I feel like at the time, I think suits an individual picture.
I hate conformity.
Clickbait
Seems to me that framing has been almost universal in the art world, and I believe it's quite typical that it was/is not done or overseen by the artist. (Perhaps because it's so darn' expensive?) Modern art displayed unframed in galleries is almost always hung on a large expanse of white wall. So I'm pushed to the conclusion that the main function of border, matt and frame is to isolate the image from its surroundings, irrespective of whether the composition is closed or open. Are you suggesting something different?I just laid open the key to determine if a print is an open composition or a closed composition and pushed the wrong bloody button instead of "Post reply".
I'll not write that up again tonight, so I simply suggest you do some graphic arts searches and read up on how to identify them and when and how they are best used.
Look under beginners drawing and painting lessons and, if you get it and know when and when not to apply those techniques to your photography, you'll be all set.
Cheers, All
So I'm pushed to the conclusion that the main function of border, matt and frame is to isolate the image from its surroundings, irrespective of whether the composition is closed or open.
Seems to me that framing has been almost universal in the art world, and I believe it's quite typical that it was/is not done or overseen by the artist. (Perhaps because it's so darn' expensive?) Modern art displayed unframed in galleries is almost always hung on a large expanse of white wall. So I'm pushed to the conclusion that the main function of border, matt and frame is to isolate the image from its surroundings, irrespective of whether the composition is closed or open. Are you suggesting something different?
Seems to me that framing has been almost universal in the art world, and I believe it's quite typical that it was/is not done or overseen by the artist. (Perhaps because it's so darn' expensive?) Modern art displayed unframed in galleries is almost always hung on a large expanse of white wall. So I'm pushed to the conclusion that the main function of border, matt and frame is to isolate the image from its surroundings, irrespective of whether the composition is closed or open. Are you suggesting something different?
I print with boarders when I want a professional framer
You have a professional framer living with you and paying rent?
I had the popcorn ready to go. What happened?
Lately I have warmed up to include the whole rebate (6x9 negative 120) in 18x24cm RC workprints and I realised that I can do that as I am using a LF glass carrier. It actually fits very very well to the paper.Purists insisting borders detract from the image. Purists insisting that cropping is evil and printed rebates show fidelity to the negative.
Having read your post, I had to grin this morning when I saw the framing style of this street exhibition, on Instagram. I could imagine forum members choking on their breakfast.We are a sad exhausted lot. It wasn’t so many years ago (or was it?) that posting this topic would’ve been like throwing steak into the lion’s den. Purists insisting borders detract from the image. Purists insisting that cropping is evil and printed rebates show fidelity to the negative. It’s contrived! No, it’s organic! No: Pretentious! People hating on Avedon, or else putting him on a pedestal. And that’s before talking about matting and framing and glazing.
I had the popcorn ready to go. What happened?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?