I thought it might be scanning issues, and posted that in the other thread.I don't think it's a light leak. They look like film processing marks to me. But I'm sure other Photrio folks would have a better insight.
You might be right. Another issue may be the film is scratched in the film chamber some how.I thought it might be scanning issues, and posted that in the other thread.
Oh, by the way, ECD, try not to double-post as it can be confusing
I don't think it's a light leak. They look like film processing marks to me. But I'm sure other Photrio folks would have a better insight.
You can get a manual adapter for the OM10 which will then allow you to choose the shutter speed. Are you sure the camera is working and metering correctly as it may be selecting a shutter speed that is too low, if you had the manual adapter you could try different speeds for the same shot to see what result you get.
I am a big fan of the Olympus OM cameras but I never got on with the OM10 or the OM20. I started with an OM40 about 30 years ago and loved that camera. My main camera now is the OM4Ti but I also use an OM1 and OM2 which can often be bought for the same price as some OM10 go for.
The line my well be due to the film catching on something in the camera so check for anything that matches where the line is on the negative.
I thought it might be scanning issues, and posted that in the other thread.
Oh, by the way, ECD, try not to double-post as it can be confusing
[Film processing] seems to be the problem, a lot of people have suggested that. It was practically confirmed by looking at the negatives which had no sign of the line whatsoever.
Some C-41 machines have roller transports. Poor maintenance can result in dirty rollers and leave marks on negatives. But this is just a guess.How can film processing be the cause and the lines not showing up in the negative ??
you can probably hand hold the camera if you keep the shutter speed at 1/60 second or slower.
.
Thanks - I've corrected it to read 1/60 second or shorter, but you can use faster to mean the same.I am sure Matt meant at 1/60th or FASTER...
Looks like camera shake during part of a long exposure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?