dancqu said:
I'd like to do some film developer tests using
film; blue sensitive only. I've a transmission
densitometer. My very well lighted Graded
paper darkroom would fog any Ortho. Dan
Well I'm only trying for ballpark results so I'll continue
using the Arista Grade 2 RC. It is blue only sensitive.
I tested an FX-1/Beutler's/Ansco 120/Beer's A type of
developer a few days ago. You know, the metol, sulfite,
carbonate type.
The test on paper is at one or more possible film strengths.
I know that the above developer will produce good negatives.
A film, a formula. Now another formula. Should I not expect
similar same film results when paper results with the other
formula are similar?
For example, what if I wanted to test a low sulfite D-76;
10 rather than 100 grams. I'd test in on paper and make a
comparison with the known film/developer's print results.
If results are similar then I'm in the ballpark with
a new developer.
I've not a whole bunch of film developers to test against
a whole bunch of films. But I do have some and I'd sooner
not have to load, expose, and process a roll for A test. On
top of that I'm a slow shooter.
I'm all alone on this one as I've not seen it suggested that
film developer formulas be tested in this manner. Dan