but the ph was around 6-7.
I doubt Ra4 blix will work with slide films or even with negative films.
I don't know how paper works, but a blix capable of blixing slide film should blix paper no stress right?
Only real drawback
From what I've gathered over the years, EDTA bleaches work but tend to be very slow compared to DTPA. A small excess of EDTA might fix that issue, I may try it sometime.
Ferricyanide bleaches work very well, but you MUST buffer them to avoid pH related issues with red stains, something that destroyed a large amount of film for me 30+ years ago. Half a gram of borax per 500 mL of ferricyanide bleach works wonders, I use it for C41, ECN-2, and E6. Only real drawback to it is that strong acids contaminating it WILL release hydrogen cyanide, and incomplete washiing WILL precipitate Prussian Blue (ferrocyanide) in both film and fixer.
ECN-2 is rated for very strong bleaches, so ferricyanide may well work for this process.
Indeed; it's at least indicated by Kodak as an 'official', albeit it 'alternate' bleach. Still, it has left me wondering why this is the case - does ECN2 film involve stabilization/protection mechanisms that survive a ferricyanide bleach? Or is the truth more prosaic: is ECN2 film intended as an intermediate and simply not intended for long-term storage, and does it not even involves the protection that may be present in C41 films, so that whatever bleach you throw at it is inconsequential in the first place? I have very strong suspicions that the latter may be closer to the truth than the former - but admittedly, nothing to back up that suspicion.
Indeed; it's at least indicated by Kodak as an 'official', albeit it 'alternate' bleach. Still, it has left me wondering why this is the case - does ECN2 film involve stabilization/protection mechanisms that survive a ferricyanide bleach? Or is the truth more prosaic: is ECN2 film intended as an intermediate and simply not intended for long-term storage, and does it not even involves the protection that may be present in C41 films, so that whatever bleach you throw at it is inconsequential in the first place? I have very strong suspicions that the latter may be closer to the truth than the former - but admittedly, nothing to back up that suspicion.
My other impression is, that E-6 film was never really a love child of Kodak: they much preferred the color accuracy of masked C-41 film, and it did not surprise me at all, that they ditched E100VS at the first sign of real trouble. Volumes must have been very low, too, so their motivation to improve the process must have been very close to zero.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?