anyhuus said:
Doing it the way he describes with the 25ml bottles,
would result in a consentration of only 0,25 gram metol
per liter working solution. Are my maths wrong ...
Your math is correct. If he used a full liter, OK.
Half that amount and I'd have doubts. Then again
he did have very slow thin emulsion films in mind.
Surface development was an objective. Very
dilute and very active compensating
developers resulted.
From P. Dignan's Classic B&W Formulas the formula is:
1.0, 5.0, 5.85 grams - metol, S. sulfite, S. carbonate
mono. I think the trace of iodide optional.
FX-1, Ansco 120, and Beer's A are similar brews.
All, including Beutler's, can make a good print
developer and as variations on the same,
can make good film developers.
BTW, what is Calgon doing in that formula to which
you pointed. I've not ever seen that included. That
100 grams of S. carbonate I think an error. The B
solution of hydroquinone makes of Beutler's a
Beer's A & B VC paper developer. Dan