Best Scanner for this application?

Anonymous

Member
Joined
May 14, 2003
Messages
59
I have some 16X20 prints that I no longer have the negatives for. What is the best flat bed scanner for scanning these prints and arriving at a digital file suitable for generation of a negative or digital output?

The largest that I have found at B and H photo is the Epson 10000 and it does not appear capable of scanning this image size...would this work by scanning portions of the image and then stitching in PS?

Is there a third party that does high resolution scanning that would permit me to not purchase an expensive scanner?

Thanks for your thoughts on this.
 

toyotadesigner

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
266
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
You might search for a service company that does book scanning. They have scanners for (very) large formats and usually work for museums or public archives.

The scan resolution is second to none and you can send the data to someone with a slide printer at high resolutions.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,982
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
For large items, it can make more sense to use a camera with a digital scanning back, which is what high-end digital art repro places use.

A less costly solution for occasional use might be a DSLR on the back of a view camera with a sliding back for making stitched panoramic images, using rear rise/fall or shift for capturing the other dimension. Fotodiox makes such a back in EOS and Nikon mounts that attaches to a 4x5" Graflok back, and it's under $200.
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Donald
What David says,phase capture on hasselblad in our studio is how we do it now.
I do have the Epson1000xl and we have stitched 16x20 prints with no problem , just a lot of patience.
I would do the scans for you but let you work on the stitching if you would like.
Bob
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan

I think Jens makes an excellent suggestion. These kind of scanners produce excellent results and if you don't have a lot of prints to digitize then this may produce the best quality.

Don Bryant
 

KnightHawk_StudioLab

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
5
Location
Vancouver/Se
Format
Medium Format
Where are you located? I can scan them for you...

REPLY: HI, I am in Vancouver and using a 4 X 5 ScanBack that produces are very large uncompressed file using a technical camera mounted on a giant enlarger/copier type assemply with dedicated and very even lighting.

If you have a budget for outsourcing and are OK with popping these in a large tube, I can guarantee they will be treated like gold, and back in your hands, along with the new digital files.

Jerome





 

williamtheis

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
68
Location
the Mojave d
Format
4x5 Format
or you might scan with a high end flatbed: I have an Scitex/Creo Eversmart Pro II with a 30cmx44cm that does an exceptional job and would minimize the number of stitches. Remember that most prints are only 150 lines/inch so the Creo is pretty much overkill. Same for dynamic range of a print (no DMAX of over 4!) It does however do a magnificent capture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
Don,

I do art reproduction at work with a Betterlight Super 8K (plus vacuum easel plus northlight HMI lighting) and can do them for you w/o the hassle of international shipping.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register