If you’re ok with hyperfocal distance and focus by guesswork, then the Rollei 35 is an excellent buy. Sharp lens, manual controls, small size and very reasonably priced.
Some people find the ergonomics a bit odd, though, and it doesn’t have a built in flash (although it does have a hot shoe).
Absolutely!How about the Olympus XA or XA2? I've had mine for years and they are still going strong.
But being not AF can you call it P&S?The only reliable Contax T is the original T! i.e. the one that does not have AF. T2, T3, TVS etc are a really risky buy now.
Most probably the most reliable fancy P&S is the Fujifilm Klasse S or W (not the original) just because they are the newest. And the Rollei QZ35 cameras which are also relatively new, the most awesome P&S out there (check the specs) and because of that I own two...
I have both and they are fine but can you call them P&S because you have to focus via the rangefinder on the XA and zone focus on the XA2?How about the Olympus XA or XA2? I've had mine for years and they are still going strong.
But being not AF can you call it P&S?
How about the Olympus XA or XA2? I've had mine for years and they are still going strong.
People use the term P&S a lot of time when they meant compact. So yes the Konica Hexar AF is point and shoot but also the Nikon F5 but they don't call them P&S just because they are too big. So really we need a good definition of P&S.Nope !
--
What about the Konica Hexar AF ? I used to have a total of four of them.
One I sold, another one was a ''divorce victim''; the third oneI lost in a cable car station... #4 stays with me.
None of these four has ever given me any trouble.
View attachment 292029 View attachment 292030
Konica Hexar AF on Kodak Ektachrome Elite 100 (5045)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?